Essay services

GET AN ESSAY OR ANY OTHER HOMEWORK WRITING HELP FOR A FAIR PRICE! CHECK IT HERE!


ORDER NOW

List of approved essay services



Essay more people should use public transport

10 reasons why you should use public transport : TreeHugger

Task 2: Public Transport and Cars

also think more carefully about how to support your arguments with strong ideas. in spite of the strength of this argument ,these negative impacts can be eliminated if sophisticated illuminating campaigns are to be launched to enhance people’s awareness concerning the potential risks of using cell phones in public places . think that cell phones have become one of the compelling necessities for people . in this essay i will discuss the arguments for and against using private cars or public transport. i, therefore, believe that we should use it acknowledging the requirement instead of banning and making it an issue. in addition, the generation of radiation by the use of cell phones also causes various cancers according to medical experts. you disagree that mobile phones should be banned then your full essay should explain why you think they shouldn’t be banned. i completely agree with this idea because of some the following reasons. note that some of the above ideas are not connected to the exact essay question (for example, they include ideas about banning phones in hospitals or museums – these are ideas just to help you with the general topic rather than the exact essay question). can you be more clear about how many paragraph it should be? we are concerned about the misuse , most people are aware of the public behavior . use of mobile phones in public places has become rampant over recent decades. furthermore, mobile phones can also be used as a navigation device to help drivers to navigate the roadways. conclusion , in spite of the negative impacts of using cell phones in public places , they shouldn’t be entirely banned . they have become intrinsic component of peoples lives and there for should not be prohibited in public places . i thought there should be (introduction,opinion,first,second paragraph,and conclusion). 2011, an organization called greenxc[6] created a campaign to encourage others to use this form of transportation in order to reduce their own carbon footprint. the other hand, there are also two valid points to prove that imposing a full ban on mobile phones usage would be unfair to its users. are useful for families overseas to get in touch with each other. it is, therefore, fairly easy to understand why some people demand restricting mobile phones in certain places. i have used some expressions and phrasal verbs which i hope fit in the context. all in all, public transport is proven to be more efficient and cheaper than private cars. they have rescued the lives of many people through calling the police or ambulances in emergencies . firstly, they think that private cars are faster than public transport since you don’t have to spend your priceless [or precious] time waiting for a bus[it would be best to put a full stop here, or a comma followed by usually under. in these cities public transport is faster than private cars. some people believe that using mobile phones is not allowed in public places. in fact you have more arguments against the use of mobile phones than for the use of them. this gives the impression you are a doctor and the only language you know well is medical language – being able to write two strong sentences with medical language will not give you a higher band score when the rest of your essay uses lower level language. all in all, public transport is proven to be more efficient and cheaper than private cars. a days , increasing usage of cell phone in public place urging a demand of prohibiting it usage in public place because it creates number of problem to people. shops as an example, when people are busy sending texts rather than addressing to seller in front of them..grammer and terms that i used (is it academic or not).: car culturehitchhikingsustainable transporthidden categories: webarchive template wayback linkscs1 errors: datesuse dmy dates from january 2015all articles with unsourced statementsarticles with unsourced statements from april 2012articles with dmoz links. is true that mobiles(cell) phones should be prohibited in general places such a libraries and shop and on public transport. this level is exceeded by the use of mobile phones in public places as confirmed by medical experts. in my view, public transport is cheaper than using our own cars. use of mobile phones on public transport can also eradicate monotony during long journeys. people believe that using cell phones in the public areas can cause plenty of disadvantages and therefore should not be allowed, i disagree with this view because of a couple of reasons. it distracts people’s attention and results in negatively impacting their work output . in these cities public transport makes for faster than private cars. i suggest your work on your punctuation and learn how many paragraphs there should be in an ielts essay.

Task 2: Public Transport and Cars

Essee

also think more carefully about how to support your arguments with strong ideas. take a look at your conclusion: ” should not be prohibited in public places . at present, it would be labelled as “mechanical” and this means each linking word is used like a machine without flexibility. usually there is a fare set up by the car driver and accepted by passengers, because they get an agreement before trip start. banning mobile phone in public places would, therefore, not be a justifiable solution. for banning the use of cell phones in public places argue that excess use of mobiles results in negative impacts on people and even catastrophic ones ..grammer and terms that i used (is it academic or not). this means that each body paragraph should contain reasons why you believe there should not be a complete ban. this is an academic essay and vocabulary must be appropriate and also used in the right context. this can be used in case of emergencies such as accidents at public places. conclusion, while use of cell-phones can be limited in some areas of public places where they cause disturbance in other devices or services, in my opinion they should be allowed in rest of the places as they may help in dangerous situations and provide entertainment. – nick these days, more and more people are using their own cars to commute. although some people believe that using cell phones in public places should be prohibited, i do not agree that it should be for several reasons which will be discussed in this essay., having cell phones helped people to communicate with other people faster, cheaper and more comfortable. personally , although i critic the excessive use of cell phones in such places , i believe that they shouldn’t be entirely banned for some reasons which i intent to advocate in this essay .: “using cell phones in public places have …” the subject is not “cell phones” plural, it is “using cell phones in public places. this statement says that you believe they should be prohibited but other paragraphs say the opposite. have different views about whether to ban the use of mobile phones in punlic places such as malls and libraries. personally , i believe that banning them could have a detrimental impact on people for a couple of reasons . i agree that callers must not use their mobile phones to disturb others in these places, i do not believe that they should not answer all calls due to three principal reasons. sum up, with the above mentioned functions, i believe that people should have the right to be free in using their phones in public places. this is because mobile signals could interfere with some some equipments and possible damage could resulted from this. futhermore , in the library, when your cell phone rings or you speak in a loud voice you may obstacle, annoyed people who are sitting near to you and reading. i, therefore, believe that we should use it acknowledging the requirement instead of banning and making it an issue. conclusion the phones are simllar to other devices that the human create and its depend on moral of person and the way he use , and in my point of view phone devices should not be prohibited in public places. the one hand using mobile phone to make a call in public places for example ,the libraries,sites in which the reader need to focus on their reading can be annoying and distrubing to other,moreover phones are emitting electrical signals which may have damaging effect on human health and also these signal may interfere with other devices. therefore, cell phones provide myriad of benefits and should be permitted in ethical circumstances. on the other hand, there are people who don’t like to share room with unknown persons and they don’t like standing up during the trip., there are adequate number of reasons why cellular phones should not be restricted in some local sites.. call phones should not banned anywhere – cell phones should not be banned everywhere. when you use a gerund as a noun it will be singular. for instance, while people are waiting or in their spare time they can study for ielts exam with ielts applications downloaded from playstore or ebooks. although i agree that phones should be banned in certain places, i disagree with their strict prohibition in such public places. to lessen the problem awareness can be increased among the people . you disagree that mobile phones should be banned then your full essay should explain why you think they shouldn’t be banned. recent essay question reported on jan 31:Some people think that the use of mobiles (cell) phones should be banned in public places such a in libraries and shop and on public transport. conclusion, using private cars is expensive and produces more [atmospheric] pollution than does public transport. you have naturally good english, don’t try to put too much descriptive vocabulary into an academic essay and be 100% of your language – more errors = lower score. for instance, i remember recently when i commuted to work by train, there was a man sitting next to me who used his phone constantly and made called loudly without attention to other passangers.- in these cities public transport makes for the fastest means of commuting. the driver doesn’t try to earn money, but to share with several people the cost of a trip he would do anyway.

Scorecard thesis on real estate company

Public Transportation Benefits

i completely agree with this idea because of some the following reasons. the other hand phone calls nowadays is critical to a lot of people such as those whom most of their jobs are done by telecommunication, another things that make the phone devices indispensable in modern life are the invention of smart phone technologies which makes the phone multifunctional and being more than just a device used for calling, for example most of poeple using social networks to communicate with each other as facebook,twitter etc, and that is made be possible by using phone as its portable and easy to use,another importance of phones is that their usefulness in emergency situations when someone needs a help., this is all about the language you use and the way you present it. people prefer use private cars to public transport for several reasons.” this is all about the advantages of mobiles not about why they should not be banned. i believe that the mobile phones should be banned in public places where they interrupt services or break rules. for instance, if the people who use a bus used their own vehicles instead of, it would be the equivalent to 60 cars producing fumes. the use of mobile phones generates noise in public places since you have various people talking at various voice pitches. sum up, any civilised debate is healthy and people are entitled to share their opinions and suggestions about a whole range of topics. secondly, phones can even save people’s lives, especially in a case of an accident or if someone suffers from sudden hearts attack while shopping. note that some of the above ideas are not connected to the exact essay question (for example, they include ideas about banning phones in hospitals or museums – these are ideas just to help you with the general topic rather than the exact essay question). is true that mobile phones are the one of the major reasons of noise pollution in public areas. ask people who use private cars on a regular basis how much money they spend on their cars every month. conclusion, the use of cell phones should be highly restricted in public places so as to prevent its potential health hazard to people who are not aware of the harm. is considered by many people that mobile phones should not be allowed in public places, like libraries, shops and transport. my opinion mobile phone devices should not be inhibited in general places. the generation of noise and radiation from the use of cell phones is seen as being harmful to health. considered by some that mobile phones must be prohibited in public places such as in shops ,libraries ,and public transportation system. this is because these places are usually calm, where people visit to read or relax. futhermore , in the library, when your cell phone rings or you speak in a loud voice you may obstacle, annoyed people who are sitting near to you and reading. summarize, cell phone, a multifunctional device, is more informative and entertaining which has benefited us in every walk with its abundant of facilities. in addition to this, phones can annoy and cause nuisance exploiting the experience of others while travelling by interacting loudly on phones. for example if someone met in a motor vehicle accident they can be used to contact wrecking service, police, ambulance, fire station, as well as capture pertinent details such as picture of license plate and even dented vehicle. additionally, cell phones can be used as a camcorder or voice recorder to capture special moments. you state in your essay “let me clarify why cell phones should be prohibited in public areas. the one hand, there are two compelling grounds to impose an entire ban on using cell phones in public areas. noise is highly intrusive and is often a nuisance to most people. nonetheless , such negative impact could be cancelled out through the use of headphones and smart mikes .. i’m still not clear on your opinion because you write very clearly that “callers must not use their phones to disturb others” but then you write “i do not believe they should not answer all calls…” which means the opposite. conclusion, while use of cell-phones can be limited in some areas of public places where they cause disturbance in other devices or services, in my opinion they should be allowed in rest of the places as they may help in dangerous situations and provide entertainment. what you have suggested definitely makes sense , but my understanding is that the body paragraphs should follow the introduction(may be i am approaching opinion essays totally wrong).. it creates a number of problems to people = it creates a number of problems (s) for people., i believe that mobiles should not be prohibited in the all public places. they are distracted by this noise which often limits people’s activities whenever they need to engage in certain activities for instance, reading in a library. is thought that using cell phones in public places have become a hazard and therefore should be banned .[10] the popularity of the internet and mobile phones has greatly helped carpooling to expand, enabling people to offer and find rides thanks to easy-to-use and reliable online transport marketplaces. this noise most often is unbearable to people who are present in these places. having more people using one vehicle, carpooling reduces each person's travel costs such as fuel costs, tolls, and the stress of driving. you have written “firstly, it constitutes a form of public disturbance. begin with,using mobile phones in public places brougt negative effects in people’s life for example , while people drining a car and talking on the phone or listening to music from mobile phones they can not concentrate onthe road. unlike private cars, public transport has got reserved lanes in many cities so long delays due to traffic congestion can be avoided using a bus or a taxi. Sorority experience on resume 

My Third , Have A Look!! :)

however, one point of concern is that this is an opinion essay and your opinion is that you think there should not be a complete ban on the use of mobile phones. conclusion, using private cars is expensive and produces more pollution on atmosphere than public transport. conclusion , i believe that cell phones function more beyond being being a source of nuisance as it is alleged by some . in my opinion, i strongly disagree that public usage of mobile phones should be banned for several reasons which will be discussed in this essay. are other people who prefer public transport to private cars. strongly believe that there should be no attempts to prevent anyone from using mobile phones in public sites. is considered by many people that mobile phones should not be allowed in public places, like libraries, shops and transport. it is very useful for people to search everything whatever they want. herein, i do recommend that cell phones should be only used for emergencies in public places . people should be at liberty to use them wherever and whenever they wish. for example if someone met in a motor vehicle accident they can be used to contact wrecking service, police, ambulance, fire station, as well as capture pertinent details such as picture of license plate and even dented vehicle. this gives carpooling extra flexibility, and enables more people to share journeys and save money. in my opinion, i strongly believe public use of phones should be banned owing to several reasons which shall be discussed in this essay., there are adequate number of reasons why cellular phones should not be restricted in some local sites.-time ridesharing allows people to arrange ad hoc rides on very short notice, through the use of smartphone applications or the internet. further and even more importantly , though , most of crimes have been either prevented or authenticated due to the prompt use off cell phones . signal can cause problems in some public places, such as hospitals, by interfering with delicate instruments or equipment. is true that mobile phones are the one of the major reasons of noise pollution in public areas. of fights culminated in a free society, where people have their basic rights, such as talking on the phone or texting their loved ones, guaranteed by the state. summarize, although cell phone, a multifunctional device, is more informative and entertaining, it creates a negative impression. obviously, it is expected that each one show their respect towards others while using their handsets, but by no means should they be forbidden to do so. however, in all other places they should be allowed as long as they are used with respect to others. in addition to this, phones can annoy and cause nuisance exploiting the experience of others while travelling by interacting loudly on phones. this means that each body paragraph should contain reasons why you believe there should not be a complete ban. conclusion , in spite of the negative impacts of using cell phones in public places , they shouldn’t be entirely banned . obviously, it is expected that each one show their respect towards others while using their handsets, but by no means should they be forbidden to do so. it has innumerable uses in our life, sometimes it becomes nuisance. is true that mobile phones are one of the major reasons for increased noise pollution in public areas. noise is highly intrusive and is often a nuisance to most people. they are distracted by this noise which often limits people’s activities whenever they need to engage in certain activities for instance, reading in a library. use of mobile phones in public places have become rampant over recent decades. people think that the use mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries, shops and public transport. a good example is, the echocardiograph which is an instrument uses to diagnised heard diseases, could have a significant error when there is conflict between the mobile frequencies with its function.. department of transportation, federal highway administration, 2009 national household travel survey". this is an academic essay and vocabulary must be appropriate and also used in the right context. summarize, cell phone, a multifunctional device, is more informative and entertaining which has benefited us in every walk with its abundant of facilities. this radiation is high when exposure to mobile phone radiations is more as seen in unrestricted use of mobile phones in public places. for companies like lyft and uber, see transportation network company. shops as an example, when people are busy sending texts rather than addressing to seller in front of them. maybe 'this is' is ommited in a more informal style.. liz , can i still write about people who agree with this (in one paragraph) although i disagree(another paragraph)?

IELTS Essay Ideas: Banning Mobile Phones

this radiation is high when exposure to mobile phone radiations is more as seen in unrestricted use of mobile phones in public places. conclude, althoug, using mobile phones is not allowed in some public places but i believe that it impacted on the way people spend their time. these websites are commonly used for one-off long-distance journeys with high fuel costs. days, it is common to find people using cell phones in various public places such as, markets, banks and reading rooms. you have naturally good english, don’t try to put too much descriptive vocabulary into an academic essay and be 100% of your language – more errors = lower score. summarize, cell phone, a multifunctional device, is more informative and entertaining which has benefited us in every walk with its abundant of facilities. in my opinion, i strongly believe public use of phones should be banned owing to several reasons which shall be discussed in this essay. people think that the use of mobile (cell) phone should be banned in public places, such as: in libraries, shop and on public transport. are other people who prefer public transport to private cars. ask people who use private cars on a regular basis how much they spend on their cars every month. by using this site, you agree to the terms of use and privacy policy. use of mobile phones in public places has become rampant over recent decades. in your introduction, don’t write “while i agree to to some extent with this notion…” because it is completely irrelevant and confusing for the reader.. answer the questions – each body paragraph must explain one reason why you think mobile phones should not be banned.. liz , can i still write about people who agree with this (in one paragraph) although i disagree(another paragraph)? use of mobile phones in public places has become rampant over recent decades. likewise, the phone signals can also cause some serious complications in some public places such as hospitals by interfering with delicate instruments or equipment. in your introduction, don’t write “while i agree to to some extent with this notion…” because it is completely irrelevant and confusing for the reader. you state in your essay “let me clarify why cell phones should be prohibited in public areas. you can’t only write why mobile phones are useful – explain why they should not be banned in each body paragraph.. answer the questions – each body paragraph must explain one reason why you think mobile phones should not be banned. personally , i believe that banning them could have a detrimental impact on people for a couple of reasons . in this case, a ring tone and a verbal conversation made by people can distract the attention. the generation of noise and radiation from the use of cell phones is seen as being harmful to health. for instance, if the people who use a bus used their own vehicles instead of, it would be the equivalent to 60 cars producing fumes., or car sharing as it is called in british english, is promoted by a national uk charity, carplus, whose mission is to promote responsible car use in order to alleviate financial, environmental and social costs of motoring today, and encourage new approaches to car dependency in the uk. this made people compalin and a sfatff member had to ask him to either terminate the call or leave the coach immediatly. i agree that callers must not use their mobile phones to disturb others in these places, i do not believe that they should not answer all calls due to three principal reasons. is often believed that the use of cell phones should be prohibited in certain public areas like malls and reading buildings . people think that the use of mobile (cell) phone should be banned in public places, such as: in libraries, shop and on public transport. failure to do this may cause a burden on the populace and the government when diseases emerge because of this., adherents to the trend of prohibiting the use of mobiles in public places contend that most of street noise and nuisance are attributed to the vast use of cell phones in public places .- "in these cities public transport makes for the fastest means of commuting". the use of mobile phones generates noise in public places since you have various people talking at various voice pitches. people usually get distracted and become less attentive to hazards surrounding them when calling someone or answering someone’s call because most of their focus and concentration is paid to the call . secondly, you can go direct from work to home without stopping time and time again to pick people up. wide range of cell phones use recently are getting bigger and bigger. all the way is a book written by author jatin kuberkar that narrates a success story of a car pool with twelve people on board. here , i recommend that cell phones are to be used only in ultimate emergencies . however, they shouldn’t be used mechanically and they shouldn’t be overused. can provide entertainment when travelling on tedious journeys, particularly on public transport.

,

Carpool - Wikipedia

are antisocial as people are too busy sending messages to talk to the people in front of them, for example in a shop when they are being served. the use of mobile phones generates noise in public places since you have various people talking at various voice pitches. i will discuss for and against arguments about using either private cars or public transport in this essay. just make it clear “in my opinion, i disagree that mobile phones should be prohibited in public places…”. the uses of handspones could disturb people around us and thus make them feel stressed and irritated. the other hand phone calls nowadays is critical to a lot of people such as those whom most of their jobs are done by telecommunication, another things that make the phone devices indispensable in modern life are the invention of smart phone technologies which makes the phone multifunctional and being more than just a device used for calling, for example most of poeple using social networks to communicate with each other as facebook,twitter etc, and that is made be possible by using phone as its portable and easy to use,another importance of phones is that their usefulness in emergency situations when someone needs a help. therefore, the use of mobile phones should be restricted in these buildings o cases.“sine quo non to grasp” – don’t use this in an english language test. they must be used flexibly for the higher scores in coherence and cohesion. there are platforms that facilitate carpooling by connecting people seeking respectively passengers and drivers. just make it clear “in my opinion, i disagree that mobile phones should be prohibited in public places…”..So if i understand correctly, if give my introductory opinion that mobile phones should be restricted to an extent that will help public. however, i thought that using linkers at the beginning of each sentence would make my essay more cohesive. futhermore, using applications on a cell phone could help you find the way to any place without being lost , even find hotels or restaurant when you travel. days, it is common to find people using cell phones in various public places such as, markets, banks and reading rooms. in other words, communicating while on the go is a feature enabled by technology, which has made peoples` lives much easier and safer. not only would this mean a breach of the core rights of individuals, but it could also cause an emergency situation to be neglected. me clarify why cell phones should be prohibited in public areas. people think that the use of mobile (cell) phone should be banned in public places, such as: in libraries, shop and on public transport. the generation of noise and radiation from the use of cell phones is seen as being harmful to health., this is all about the language you use and the way you present it. recent essay question reported on jan 31:Some people think that the use of mobiles (cell) phones should be banned in public places such a in libraries and shop and on public transport. people think that the use of mobile (cell) phone should be banned in public places, such as: in libraries, shop and on public transport. conclusion, using private cars is expensive and produces more [atmospheric] pollution than does public transport. in fact, not all words can be successfully paraphrased “reading buildings” is not really in the english vocabulary so that means you must use the word “library” repeatedly. failure to do this may cause a burden on the populace and the government when diseases emerge because of this. conclusion, although, using mobile phones in public places can have some negative consequences, yet, i disagree with the idea of banning them fully, as this would clearly be an unjustifiable explanation to its users. in other words, library is the place where people go to accumulate information and knowledge. is true that mobile phones are the one of the major reasons of noise pollution in public areas.. urging a demand of prohibiting it usage in public places = urging a demand to prohibit it being used in public places. nonetheless , such negative impact could be cancelled out through the use of headphones and smart mikes . secondly, signal of mobile phone can cause serious problems in some public places such as hospital by interfering with delicate instruments or equipment. it is mechanical because you start each sentence with a linker. is argued that moblie phones should be barred in some public areas. you want to write about both sides then you must write “in my opinion, mobile phones should not be banned but should have restricted use in public places., cell phone is a source of quick communication which is very useful to covey our message. additionally, cell phones can be used as a camcorder or voice recorder to capture special moments. further and even more importantly , though , most of crimes have been either prevented or authenticated due to the prompt use off cell phones . personally , although i critic the excessive use of cell phones in such places , i believe that they shouldn’t be entirely banned for some reasons which i intent to advocate in this essay . for example, if the people who use a bus were to use their own vehicles instead, this would add another 60 cars producing fumes to the road. in fact you have more arguments against the use of mobile phones than for the use of them.

What is Public Transportation: Modes and Benefits - Conserve

people think that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places such as in libraries, shops and on public transport. one can talk or chat with their near ones, listen to songs, surf the internet, use cameras, and so on. are useful for families overseas to get in touch with each other., the use of mobile phones on public transport eradicates monotony during long journeys. in addition, the generation of radiation by the use of cell phones also causes various cancers according to medical experts. when faced with taking private cars or public transport people react in different ways. on 19 march 2012 endre spaller, a member of the hungarian parliament interpellated secretary of the state x about this practice who replied that carpooling should be endorsed instead of punished, however care must be taken for some people trying to turn it into a way to gain untaxed profit. it is mechanical because you start each sentence with a linker. people think that the use of mobile (cell) phone should be banned in public places, such as: in libraries, shop and on public transport. are multi-functional and can be used as recording devices or cameras so shouldn’t be banned in public. in each body paragraph you should explain and support your opinion., cell phone is a source of quick communication which is very useful to covey our message. by a student named tundea:These days, it is common to find people using cell phones in various public places such as, markets, banks and reading rooms. for this reason, i feel that we should all try to use public transport whenever possible. the use of mobile phones generates noise in public places since you have various people talking at various voice pitches. personally, i believe that they should not be banned unless they do not cause any interruption or interference in service or equipment. it could be used here] there are other people who prefer public transport to private cars. they have rescued the lives of many people through calling the police or ambulances in emergencies . this circumstances banning the use of mobile cannot be wise decision . banning mobile phone in public places would, therefore, not be a justifiable solution. therefore, cell phones provide myriad of benefits and should be permitted in ethical circumstances. people prefer use private cars to public transport for several reasons. here is more feedback:Your introduction is still not written clearly enough. my point of view, cell phones should not banned anywhere whereas we can take few measures to avoid the intrusive and other things. is true that mobile phones are the one of the major reasons of noise pollution in public areas. your opinion is that the use of mobiles should be restricted but not banned, then you can explain why they should not be completely banned and you can explain what restrictions you think there should be. is often argued by some masses that cell phones should be prohibited in common places such as libraries, shops and public places. this level is exceeded by the use of mobile phones in public places as confirmed by medical experts. the one hand, there are two compelling grounds to impose an entire ban on using cell phones in public areas. this is commonly seen in communal places such as public transport, restaurants and other leisure venues. carpooling is also a more environmentally friendly and sustainable way to travel as sharing journeys reduces air pollution, carbon emissions, traffic congestion on the roads, and the need for parking spaces. as for as environment is concerned the use of public transport instead of private cars makes a difference. i, therefore, believe that we should use it acknowledging the requirement instead of banning and making it an issue. in these cities public transport makes for faster than private cars. secondly, phones can even save people’s lives, especially in a case of an accident or if someone suffers from sudden hearts attack while shopping. sum up, any civilised debate is healthy and people are entitled to share their opinions and suggestions about a whole range of topics. i, therefore, believe that it should be used acknowledging the requirement. for this reason, i feel that we should all try to use public transport whenever possible. liz excuse me because i didnt read the rules for posting a comment on your pages i am really apologize for the mistake that i made. in this case, a ring tone and a verbal conversation made by people can distract the attention. in writing task 2, each body paragraph should be equally well supported and that means the same length.

Technology good bad essay paper

Transportation Patterns and Problems of People with Disabilities

[16] one remedy used by internet carpooling schemes is reputation systems that flag problematic users and allow responsible users to build up trust capital, such systems greatly increase the value of the website for the user community. i like to include a balanced opinion because this gives me the chance to write more. think that cell phones have become one of the compelling necessities for people . similarly, mobile signals can cause problems in some frequently used places such as hospitals by interfering with delicate instruments. phones should be banned in places where they interfere with equipment, interrupt a service or break rules, such as in a library, but in all other public places they should be allowed as long as they are used with respect to others. this has resulted in an exacerbated use of mobiles and has consequently urged many people to call for halting their use in public places such as malls, reading rooms and public transport means. point to check is your linking “and there for should not be prohibited in public places” = “and, therefore, should not be …. this means you can’t use “it” as a subject in a topic sentence. is suggested that there should be a complete restriction on using cell phones in public places where they turn into disruptive tools. i suggest your work on your punctuation and learn how many paragraphs there should be in an ielts essay. if someone met in a motor vehicle accident for example, they can be used to contact the wrecking service, police, ambulance and fire station, as well as capture pertinent details such as a picture of license plate, third-party documents or the damaged vehicles. composition of vehicle occupancy for journey-to-work trips: evidence of ridesharing from the 2009 national household travel survey vermont add-on sample. they are distracted by this noise which often limits people’s activities whenever they need to engage in certain activities for instance, reading in a library. nevertheless, when it comes to communication and, ocnsequently, to individual freedom, the community in general should think not twice, but three times, before adopting any measure to curb it. is true that mobiles(cell) phones should be prohibited in general places such a libraries and shop and on public transport. is true that mobile phones are the one of the major reasons of noise pollution in public areas. in this essay i am going to explain why i think that using mobile phones should be banned in public places with several reasons. some people are of the opinion that mobile phone usage in public places should be banned. conclude, with the diverse functions of cell phones, saving time and lives, and providing entertainment without being intrusive, i believe that people should be at liberty to use their phones wherever and whenever they want. i, therefore, believe that we should use it acknowledging the requirement instead of banning and making it an issue. similarly, mobile signals can cause problems in some frequently used places such as hospitals by interfering with delicate instruments. this noise most often is unbearable to people who are present in these places. you want to write about both sides then you must write “in my opinion, mobile phones should not be banned but should have restricted use in public places. likewise, the phone signals can also cause some serious complications in some public places such as hospitals by interfering with delicate instruments or equipment. are multi-functional and can be used as recording devices or cameras so shouldn’t be banned in public. for instance, while people are waiting or in their spare time they can study for ielts exam with ielts applications downloaded from playstore. as for as environment is concerned the use of public transport instead of private cars makes a difference. for instance, while people are waiting or in their spare time they can study for ielts exam with ielts applications downloaded from playstore. this is because these places are usually calm, where people visit to read or relax. conclusion, with the diverse functions of cell phones, its power to save time and lives and to provide entertainment for its users, i do not think it should be prohibited. by a student named tundea:These days, it is common to find people using cell phones in various public places such as, markets, banks and reading rooms. they have become intrinsic component of peoples lives and there for should not be prohibited in public places . in spite of the strength of this argument ,these negative impacts can be eliminated if sophisticated illuminating campaigns are to be launched to enhance people’s awareness concerning the potential risks of using cell phones in public places . are antisocial as people are too busy sending messages to talk to the people in front of them, for example in a shop when they are being served. maybe 'this is' is ommited in a more informal style. in fact, not all words can be successfully paraphrased “reading buildings” is not really in the english vocabulary so that means you must use the word “library” repeatedly. in my view, public transport is cheaper than using yourown car. your opinion is that the use of mobiles should be restricted but not banned, then you can explain why they should not be completely banned and you can explain what restrictions you think there should be.“sine quo non to grasp” – don’t use this in an english language test. furthermore, this is a great tool to eliminate monotony while travelling on public transport as it is a multi-functioned device. they can be used to send and check email, do research and even study.

essee Thesis on aodv protocol

Should All Public Transit Be Free? | Big Think

this gives the impression you are a doctor and the only language you know well is medical language – being able to write two strong sentences with medical language will not give you a higher band score when the rest of your essay uses lower level language. finally, there are people who don’t like to share their space with unknown persons[comma] and they don’t like standing up during their journey - take buses as an example, in rush hours, it is very difficult to find a spare seat and eventually you end up grasping a hand bar and trying to keep your balance so at not to not be flung around when the bus brakes. in writing task 2, each body paragraph should be equally well supported and that means the same length. is thought that using cell phones in public places have become a hazard and therefore should be banned . at present, it would be labelled as “mechanical” and this means each linking word is used like a machine without flexibility. commuting is more popular for people who work in places with more jobs nearby, and who live in places with higher residential densities. wide range of cell phones use recently are getting bigger and bigger. moreover, the over use of mobile creates a negative impact. here , i recommend that cell phones are to be used only in ultimate emergencies . that is what you should be doing in your introduction. para1 and para2 should support it and should conclude with same opinion….. it creates a number of problems to people = it creates a number of problems (s) for people. secondly, you can go direct from work to home without stopping time and time again to pick people up. in other words, these phones can cause some serious disturbance and people may find hard to concentrate while performing important tasks at their workplaces. an effort to reduce traffic and encourage carpooling, some governments have introduced high-occupancy vehicle (hov) lanes in which only vehicles with two or more passengers are allowed to drive. contrast , in some cases indiscriminate use of mobile phone has become a serious concern as people speak loudly, hampered the privacy of others. people think that the use of mobile (cell) phone should be banned in public places, such as: in libraries, shop and on public transport. it distracts people’s attention and results in negatively impacting their work output . failure to do this may cause a burden on the populace and the government when diseases emerge because of this. all in all, public transport is probed to be more efficiency and cheaper than private cars. if you take a look at some of my model essays, you will see words repeated and the use of referencing. in my opinion, i strongly disagree that public usage of mobile phones should be banned for several reasons which will be discussed in this essay. people think that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places such as in libraries, shops and on public transport. for this reason, i feel that we all should try to use public transport whenever it is possible because is beneficial for your economy, your time and environment. it is very useful for people to search everything whatever they want. in this essay i will discuss the arguments for and against using private cars or public transport. it has innumerable uses in our life, sometimes it becomes nuisance. in my opinion, i strongly believe public use of phones should be banned owing to several reasons which shall be discussed in this essay. furthermore, mobile phones can also be used as a navigation device to help drivers to navigate the roadways. this noise most often is unbearable to people who are present in these places. herein, i do recommend that cell phones should be only used for emergencies in public places . you need to be more flexible and not always put your linkers at the start of sentences. for instance, i remember recently when i commuted to work by train, there was a man sitting next to me who used his phone constantly and made called loudly without attention to other passangers. people should be at liberty to use them wherever and whenever they wish. creating and effective rules to use cell phone could be difference. addition to this the people who make calls in public places can not take their privacy as most of people still listening to their speech. however, carpooling is significantly less likely among people who spend more time at work, older workers, and homeowners. i thought there should be (introduction,opinion,first,second paragraph,and conclusion). phones should be banned in places where they interfere with equipment, interrupt a service or break rules, such as in a library, but in all other public places they should be allowed as long as they are used with respect to others. however, in all other places they should be allowed as long as they are used with respect to others. liz excuse me because i didnt read the rules for posting a comment on your pages i am really apologize for the mistake that i made.

War photographer carol ann duffy critical essay, here’s an example “in my opinion, i do not believe that mobiles phones should be banned completely but i believe there should be strict limitations on when and how they are used”. carplus is supported by transport for london, the british government initiative to reduce congestion and parking pressure and contribute to relieving the burden on the environment and to the reduction of traffic related air-pollution, in london. although some people believe that cell phone usage in public places should be prohibited, i do not agree that it should be for several reasons which will be discussed in this essay. in this essay i am going to explain why i think that using mobile phones should be banned in public places with several reasons. this is because of its constant ringtones or the phone conservation might disturb and ruin the experience of people, for instance, a student who studies in library can easily focus on his study without using mobiles rather than he brings it there. noise is highly intrusive and is often a nuisance to most people. conclusion, the use of cell phones should be highly restricted in public places so as to prevent its potential health hazard to people who are not aware of the harm. creating and effective rules to use cell phone could be difference. signal can cause problems in some public places, such as hospitals, by interfering with delicate instruments or equipment. moreover, the over use of mobile creates a negative impact. here is more feedback:Your introduction is still not written clearly enough. this means you can’t use “it” as a subject in a topic sentence. this can be used in case of emergencies such as accidents at public places. when faced with taking private cars or public transport people react in different ways. by changing from “usage” to “the use of” to “using …” already shows the skill of paraphrasing and adapting language which is all the examiner needs to see. use of mobile phones in public places has become rampant over recent decades.[4] carpooling is significantly correlated with transport operating costs, including gas prices and commute length, and with measures of social capital, such as time spent with others, time spent eating and drinking, and being unmarried. it is very useful for people to search everything whatever they want. to lessen the problem awareness can be increased among the people . use of mobile phones on public transport can also eradicate monotony during long journeys. can provide entertainment when travelling on tedious journeys, particularly on public transport., i believe that mobiles should not be prohibited in the all public places. not only would this mean a breach of the core rights of individuals, but it could also cause an emergency situation to be neglected. some public place, such as libraries, music halls or galleries, phones can annoy and ruin the experience for others.” this is all about the advantages of mobiles not about why they should not be banned. in other words, library is the place where people go to accumulate information and knowledge. – nick these days, more and more people are using their own cars to commute. is considered by many people that mobile phones should not be allowed in public places, like libraries, shops and transport. summarize, cell phone, a multifunctional device, is more informative and entertaining which has benefited us in every walk with its abundant of facilities. conclude, althoug, using mobile phones is not allowed in some public places but i believe that it impacted on the way people spend their time. you ^^ these days, more and more people are using their own cars to commute. personally, i believe that they should not be banned unless they do not cause any interruption or interference in service or equipment. the one hand using mobile phone to make a call in public places for example ,the libraries,sites in which the reader need to focus on their reading can be annoying and distrubing to other,moreover phones are emitting electrical signals which may have damaging effect on human health and also these signal may interfere with other devices. a good example is, the echocardiograph which is an instrument uses to diagnised heard diseases, could have a significant error when there is conflict between the mobile frequencies with its function. my opinion , i disagree with the idea that mobile users must not answer all calls in these places due to three principal causes. my point of view, cell phones should not banned anywhere whereas we can take few measures to avoid the intrusive and other things. this radiation is high when exposure to mobile phone radiations is more as seen in unrestricted use of mobile phones in public places. ask people who use private cars on a regular basis how much money they spend on their cars every month. all in all, public transport is probed to be more efficiency and cheaper than private cars. the other hand, there are also two valid points to prove that imposing a full ban on mobile phones usage would be unfair to its users. you ^^ these days, more and more people are using their own cars to commute. Write my wrongs freeway - summarize, although cell phone, a multifunctional device, is more informative and entertaining, it creates a negative impression. also when you write about the use of mobile phones, in the next sentence you will write “this should be avoided because…” so you avoid repeating the word by referencing using “this”. an example illustrating this in action is united states civil defense recent reports which indicate that most emergency calls notifying about fires have been received from cell phones , from people passing by fires in streets . people think that the use mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries, shops and public transport. is true that using mobile phones in public places have become rampant over the last few decades. you can’t only write why mobile phones are useful – explain why they should not be banned in each body paragraph. is suggested that there should be a complete restriction on using cell phones in public places where they turn into disruptive tools. this noise most often is unbearable to people who are present in these places. you need to be more flexible and not always put your linkers at the start of sentences., adherents to the trend of prohibiting the use of mobiles in public places contend that most of street noise and nuisance are attributed to the vast use of cell phones in public places . para1 and para2 should support it and should conclude with same opinion…. finally, cell phones have made overseas communication convenient even in public places. this level is exceeded by the use of mobile phones in public places as confirmed by medical experts. several people were fined by undercover tax officers during a 2011 crackdown, posing as passengers looking for a ride on carpooling websites. you should be proud of this essay and i’m sure you can easily fix your weaknesses to do very well. also when you write about the use of mobile phones, in the next sentence you will write “this should be avoided because…” so you avoid repeating the word by referencing using “this”. this circumstances banning the use of mobile cannot be wise decision . first, they think that private cars are faster than public transport since you don’t have to spend your priceless time waiting for the bus under a bus-shelter crammed with people. as far as the environment is concerned[comma] the use of public transport instead of private cars makes a difference. my opinion , i disagree with the idea that mobile users must not answer all calls in these places due to three principal causes. although i agree that phones should be banned in certain places, i disagree with their strict prohibition in such public places. conclusion , i believe that cell phones function more beyond being being a source of nuisance as it is alleged by some . firstly, unrestricted use of phones in certain places can be intrusive to others comfort. for instance, a crowd of people are found in shops or on public transport with their different purposes. the uses of handspones could disturb people around us and thus make them feel stressed and irritated. in my view, public transport is cheaper than using our own cars. in my view, public transport is cheaper than using yourown car. for example, if the people who use a bus were to use their own vehicles instead, this would add another 60 cars producing fumes to the road. for instance, a crowd of people are found in shops or on public transport with their different purposes. some public place, such as libraries, music halls or galleries, phones can annoy and ruin the experience for others. unlike private cars, public transport has reserved lanes in many cities [comma] so long delays due to traffic congestion can be avoided by using a bus or [a] taxi. me clarify why cell phones should be prohibited in public areas. conclusion, the use of cell phones should be highly restricted in public places so as to prevent its potential health hazard to people who are not aware of the harm. unlike private cars, public transport has got reserved lanes in many cities so long delays due to traffic congestion can be avoided using a bus or a taxi. it is very useful for people to search everything whatever they want. my opinion mobile phone devices should not be inhibited in general places. nevertheless, when it comes to communication and, ocnsequently, to individual freedom, the community in general should think not twice, but three times, before adopting any measure to curb it. i will discuss for and against arguments about using either private cars or public transport in this essay.. i’m still not clear on your opinion because you write very clearly that “callers must not use their phones to disturb others” but then you write “i do not believe they should not answer all calls…” which means the opposite. we are concerned about the misuse , most people are aware of the public behavior . an example illustrating this in action is united states civil defense recent reports which indicate that most emergency calls notifying about fires have been received from cell phones , from people passing by fires in streets ..

i, therefore, believe that it should be used acknowledging the requirement. strongly believe that there should be no attempts to prevent anyone from using mobile phones in public sites. if someone met in a motor vehicle accident for example, they can be used to contact the wrecking service, police, ambulance and fire station, as well as capture pertinent details such as a picture of license plate, third-party documents or the damaged vehicles. is often argued by some masses that cell phones should be prohibited in common places such as libraries, shops and public places. in these cities public transport is faster than private cars. however, they shouldn’t be used mechanically and they shouldn’t be overused. point to check is your linking “and there for should not be prohibited in public places” = “and, therefore, should not be …. futhermore, using applications on a cell phone could help you find the way to any place without being lost , even find hotels or restaurant when you travel. for carpooling can be made through many different mediums including public websites, social media, acting as marketplaces, employer websites, smartphone applications, carpooling agencies and pick-up points. however, one point of concern is that this is an opinion essay and your opinion is that you think there should not be a complete ban on the use of mobile phones. is true that mobile phones are the one of the major reasons of noise pollution in public areas. in addition, the generation of radiation by the use of cell phones also causes various cancers according to medical experts. furthermore, this is a great tool to eliminate monotony while travelling on public transport as it is a multi-functioned device. , cell phones are no longer used for making or receiving calls only , but for various indispensible functions as well ., having cell phones helped people to communicate with other people faster, cheaper and more comfortable. article is about the shared use of cars by persons with similar travel needs. have different views about whether to ban the use of mobile phones in punlic places such as malls and libraries. first, they think that private cars are faster than public transport since you don’t have to spend your priceless time waiting for the bus under a bus-shelter crammed with people. second, you can go from work to home directly without stopping time and time again picking people up. the generation of noise and radiation from the use of cell phones is seen as being harmful to health.- "in these cities public transport makes for the fastest means of commuting". they can be used to send and check email, do research and even study. this level is exceeded by the use of mobile phones in public places as confirmed by medical experts. i believe that the mobile phones should be banned in public places where they interrupt services or break rules. they can be used to send and check email, do research and even study. [ or “the increasing number of vehicles in our cities contributes to the high levels of pollution in the air”] when faced with taking private cars or public transport[put a comma here] people react in different ways. for this reason, i feel that we all should try to use public transport whenever it is possible because is beneficial for your economy, your time and environment. firstly, unrestricted use of phones in certain places can be intrusive to others comfort. firstly, they think that private cars are faster than public transport since you don’t have to spend your priceless [or precious] time waiting for a bus[it would be best to put a full stop here, or a comma followed by usually under. by changing from “usage” to “the use of” to “using …” already shows the skill of paraphrasing and adapting language which is all the examiner needs to see. addition to this the people who make calls in public places can not take their privacy as most of people still listening to their speech. contrast , in some cases indiscriminate use of mobile phone has become a serious concern as people speak loudly, hampered the privacy of others. this made people compalin and a sfatff member had to ask him to either terminate the call or leave the coach immediatly. conclusion, i support the plans to restrict the use of the cellular phones in public premises. , cell phones are no longer used for making or receiving calls only , but for various indispensible functions as well . sum up, with the above mentioned functions, i believe that people should have the right to be free in using their phones in public places. as far as the environment is concerned[comma] the use of public transport instead of private cars makes a difference. this essay completely disagrees and that should be made 100% clear in the introduction without any other confusing information. to write about the usage of mobile phones, you can write about using mobile phone or the use of mobile phones but again that is all. that is what you should be doing in your introduction. this statement says that you believe they should be prohibited but other paragraphs say the opposite.

considered by some that mobile phones must be prohibited in public places such as in shops ,libraries ,and public transportation system. (also car-sharing, ride-sharing, lift-sharing and covoiturage) is the sharing of car journeys so that more than one person travels in a car. can be useful in case of emergencies, for instance accidents in public places. is considered by many people that mobile phones should not be allowed in public places, like libraries, shops and transport. begin with,using mobile phones in public places brougt negative effects in people’s life for example , while people drining a car and talking on the phone or listening to music from mobile phones they can not concentrate onthe road. noise is highly intrusive and is often a nuisance to most people.. “enthusiasts for banning the use of cell phones in public places argue that ” – this essay is not about what other people argue., the use of mobile phones on public transport eradicates monotony during long journeys. conclusion, the use of cell phones should be highly restricted in public places so as to prevent its potential health hazard to people who are not aware of the harm. unlike private cars, public transport has reserved lanes in many cities [comma] so long delays due to traffic congestion can be avoided by using a bus or [a] taxi. is often believed that the use of cell phones should be prohibited in certain public areas like malls and reading buildings .- in these cities public transport makes for the fastest means of commuting., cell phone is a source of quick communication which is very useful to covey our message. in addition, the generation of radiation by the use of cell phones also causes various cancers according to medical experts. can be useful in case of emergencies, for instance accidents in public places. you have written “firstly, it constitutes a form of public disturbance. in other words, communicating while on the go is a feature enabled by technology, which has made peoples` lives much easier and safer. what you have suggested definitely makes sense , but my understanding is that the body paragraphs should follow the introduction(may be i am approaching opinion essays totally wrong). you should be proud of this essay and i’m sure you can easily fix your weaknesses to do very well., cell phone is a source of quick communication which is very useful to covey our message. on the other hand, there are people who don’t like to share room with unknown persons and they don’t like standing up during the trip. either need to change your introduction or change the language you use in the first body paragraph. like other online marketplaces, they use community-based trust mechanisms, such as user-ratings, to create an optimal experience for users. therefore, the use of mobile phones should be restricted in these buildings o cases. for banning the use of cell phones in public places argue that excess use of mobiles results in negative impacts on people and even catastrophic ones . is true that mobile phones are the one of the major reasons of noise pollution in public areas. for instance, while people are waiting or in their spare time they can study for ielts exam with ielts applications downloaded from playstore or ebooks. failure to do this may cause a burden on the populace and the government when diseases emerge because of this. people believe that using cell phones in the public areas can cause plenty of disadvantages and therefore should not be allowed, i disagree with this view because of a couple of reasons. some people are of the opinion that mobile phone usage in public places should be banned. it is very useful for people to search everything whatever they want. conclude, with the diverse functions of cell phones, saving time and lives, and providing entertainment without being intrusive, i believe that people should be at liberty to use their phones wherever and whenever they want. when you use a gerund as a noun it will be singular. finally, there are people who don’t like to share their space with unknown persons[comma] and they don’t like standing up during their journey - take buses as an example, in rush hours, it is very difficult to find a spare seat and eventually you end up grasping a hand bar and trying to keep your balance so at not to not be flung around when the bus brakes. this system automatically performs an equitable sharing of travel costs, allowing each passenger to reimburse the driver a fair share according to the benefit actually gained by the vehicle usage, proportional to the distance travelled by the passenger and the number of people that shared the car. is considered by many people that mobile phones should not be allowed in public places, like libraries, shops and transport. i have used some expressions and phrasal verbs which i hope fit in the context. so, you should have written “firstly, using mobile phones in public areas constitutes a form of public disturbance. although some people believe that using cell phones in public places should be prohibited, i do not agree that it should be for several reasons which will be discussed in this essay. they are distracted by this noise which often limits people’s activities whenever they need to engage in certain activities for instance, reading in a library. this essay completely disagrees and that should be made 100% clear in the introduction without any other confusing information.  Ansvar og skyld essay- in my opinion, i strongly believe public use of phones should be banned owing to several reasons which shall be discussed in this essay. is true that mobile phones are one of the major reasons for increased noise pollution in public areas. it is very useful for people to search everything whatever they want. however, i thought that using linkers at the beginning of each sentence would make my essay more cohesive. this is because mobile signals could interfere with some some equipments and possible damage could resulted from this. can you be more clear about how many paragraph it should be?. “enthusiasts for banning the use of cell phones in public places argue that ” – this essay is not about what other people argue. this has resulted in an exacerbated use of mobiles and has consequently urged many people to call for halting their use in public places such as malls, reading rooms and public transport means. conclusion, with the diverse functions of cell phones, its power to save time and lives and to provide entertainment for its users, i do not think it should be prohibited. in other words, these phones can cause some serious disturbance and people may find hard to concentrate while performing important tasks at their workplaces. in each body paragraph you should explain and support your opinion.. call phones should not banned anywhere – cell phones should not be banned everywhere. a stark example supporting that plea is the toll death and injuries afflicting the society everyday as a result of the careless use of mobiles in streets , while crossing high ways and even while driving over highways .: “using cell phones in public places have …” the subject is not “cell phones” plural, it is “using cell phones in public places. a days , increasing usage of cell phone in public place urging a demand of prohibiting it usage in public place because it creates number of problem to people. this radiation is high when exposure to mobile phone radiations is more as seen in unrestricted use of mobile phones in public places.. urging a demand of prohibiting it usage in public places = urging a demand to prohibit it being used in public places. use of mobile phones in public places have become rampant over recent decades. if you take a look at some of my model essays, you will see words repeated and the use of referencing. finally, cell phones have made overseas communication convenient even in public places. of fights culminated in a free society, where people have their basic rights, such as talking on the phone or texting their loved ones, guaranteed by the state. [ or “the increasing number of vehicles in our cities contributes to the high levels of pollution in the air”] when faced with taking private cars or public transport[put a comma here] people react in different ways. second, you can go from work to home directly without stopping time and time again picking people up. it could be used here] there are other people who prefer public transport to private cars. either need to change your introduction or change the language you use in the first body paragraph. people usually get distracted and become less attentive to hazards surrounding them when calling someone or answering someone’s call because most of their focus and concentration is paid to the call . some people believe that using mobile phones is not allowed in public places. this is because of its constant ringtones or the phone conservation might disturb and ruin the experience of people, for instance, a student who studies in library can easily focus on his study without using mobiles rather than he brings it there. is true that mobile phones are the one of the major reasons of noise pollution in public areas. a stark example supporting that plea is the toll death and injuries afflicting the society everyday as a result of the careless use of mobiles in streets , while crossing high ways and even while driving over highways . here’s an example “in my opinion, i do not believe that mobiles phones should be banned completely but i believe there should be strict limitations on when and how they are used”. this is commonly seen in communal places such as public transport, restaurants and other leisure venues. they can be used to send and check email, do research and even study. furthermore, phones can be beneficial in tedious journeys as these are great sources of entertainment. conclusion, although, using mobile phones in public places can have some negative consequences, yet, i disagree with the idea of banning them fully, as this would clearly be an unjustifiable explanation to its users. take a look at your conclusion: ” should not be prohibited in public places . although some people believe that cell phone usage in public places should be prohibited, i do not agree that it should be for several reasons which will be discussed in this essay. is true that using mobile phones in public places have become rampant over the last few decades. ask people who use private cars on a regular basis how much they spend on their cars every month. so, you should have written “firstly, using mobile phones in public areas constitutes a form of public disturbance. i like to include a balanced opinion because this gives me the chance to write more.


How it works

STEP 1 Submit your order

STEP 2 Pay

STEP 3 Approve preview

STEP 4 Download


Why These Services?

Premium

Quality

Satisfaction

Guaranteed

Complete

Confidentiality

Secure

Payments


For security reasons we do not
store any credit card information.