Essay services

GET AN ESSAY OR ANY OTHER HOMEWORK WRITING HELP FOR A FAIR PRICE! CHECK IT HERE!


ORDER NOW

List of approved essay services



Basic economic thesis of the federalist papers

The Federalist Papers Essay 10 Summary and Analysis | GradeSaver

An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States

beard (1913 [1935]) consolidated various scholarly views of the constitution and, in the process, offered what became identified as “the” economic interpretation of the constitution. in contrast, the modern economic history of the constitution does not take any of these positions. “economic interests and the american constitution: a quantitative rehabilitation of charles a. argues that the adoption of the constitution was based on a conflict among competing economic interests. influential study of the philadelphia convention that maintains economic interests motivated the founders throughout their deliberations. beard consolidated existing scholarly views and, in the process, his study became identified as “the” economic interpretation of the constitution. 110) concludes, “anyone wishing to rewrite the history of those proceedings largely or exclusively in terms of the economic interests represented there would find the facts to be insurmountable obstacles. the conclusions drawn from the modern evidence on the role of the economic, financial, and other interests of the founders are fundamentally different from the conclusions found in the traditional literature.

An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States

The Federalist Papers Essay 51 Summary and Analysis | GradeSaver

argues that an economic interpretation is more complex than that offered by beard. charles beard and the constitution: a critical analysis of an economic interpretation of the constitution. the interests may have been purely economic (pecuniary interests, such as the ownership or value of specific economic assets) or ideological (non-pecuniary interests, such as beliefs about the moral correctness of a particular form of government). 357) likewise concludes, “on all counts, then, beard’s thesis is entirely incompatible with the facts. a founder’s personal interests depended on his own economic interests and ideology and his constituent interests depended on the economic interests and ideologies of his constituents. the estimated magnitudes of the influences of many of the economic, financial, and other interests on the founders’ behavior are large enough that the findings suggest the product of the constitutional founding most likely would have been dramatically different had men with dramatically different interests been involved. federalist papers, the education you bring to your readers is immeasurable. an economic interpretation of the constitution of the united states.

SparkNotes: The Federalist Papers (1787-1789): Summary

among some of the better know anti-federalists, and opponents of the constitution, are patrick henry and george mason of virginia, and melancton smith of new york.” see, especially, the introduction, contained in volume one, which gives valuable coherence to anti-federalist thought. the findings indicate that the economic and other interests significantly influenced the drafting and ratification of the constitution. the anti-federalists, the opponents of the constitution and supporters of a more decentralized government, were individuals whose primary economic interests were tied to real property. because of a whole series of accidents and incidents that mock the crudely economic interpretation of the great happening of 1787-1788. earlier historical studies did not have the benefit of modern economic methodology and systematic statistical analysis. the complete anti-federalist is a superb attempt, in storing’s words, “to make available for the first time all of the substantial anti-federal writings in their complete original form and in an accurate text, together with appropriate annotation. prior historical studies more simply ask: how many of the founders with a particular economic interest (for example, founders with slaveholdings) voted the same on a particular issue?

The Making of a Conservative Superstar - The Atlantic

given the “papers” were part of a political campaign to win ratification, they should not be considered unbiased interpretations of the constitution. concludes that issues of basic constitutional design were decided on the basis of principle, whereas specific economic and political interests decided votes involving more specific issues. quantitatively test the economic model, the founders’ observed votes on a particular issue at philadelphia or on ratification are statistically related to measures of the economic interests and ideologies of the founders and their constituents. respect to ratification, the quantitative evidence indicates that the magnitudes of the influences of the economic and other interests on the ratification votes were even more considerable than for the philadelphia convention. in addition to the material on the colonial period, contains a discussion of general economic conditions in the united states in the 1780s, a discussion of the articles of confederation, and the immediate and longer-term influences on the american economy brought about by the adoption of the constitution. the economic model indicates that a founder weighed the benefits (the satisfaction) and the costs (the sacrifice) to himself of his actions, making those choices that were in his self-interest, broadly defined to include any pecuniary and non-pecuniary benefits and costs of his choices. given the success of the supporters of the constitution and the esteem given their arguments presented in the federalist, the opponents have often been denigrated and ignored. in his view, the federalists, the founders who supported a strong, centralized government and favored the constitution during its drafting and ratification, were individuals whose primary economic interests were tied to personal property.

Federalist Papers - Listed in order and by topic

yet because hamilton and, especially, madison, the “father” of the constitution, were both at the philadelphia convention that drafted the constitution and jay was a renowned lawyer, the federalist soon became the authoritative interpretation of the intention of the framers as well as the meaning of the constitution. ohsfeldt, 1984), offers an economic model of the founders that is based on rational choice and methodological individualism, and employs formal statistical techniques. several economic interests are reported for nearly 1,300 (about three-quarters) of the founders. some may have difficulty because an economic approach to the adoption of the constitution appears “too calculating. develops an economic model of the behavior of the founding fathers, discusses the data and evidence collected on the economic and other interests, and reports preliminary statistical findings on the role of economic interests in the drafting and ratification of the constitution. as a result, the modern reexamination and the prior studies will often reach different conclusions about the influence of the same economic interest or other factor on the founders’ behavior. they also suggest that economic and other interests played important roles at the ratifying conventions. this article examines how our founding fathers designed the constitution, examining findings on the political and economic factors behind the provisions included in the constitution and its ratification.

Economic Interests and the Adoption of the United States Constitution

” to some, it may appear “too deterministic” or “too economic. the findings of this reexamination, which have become the accepted view among quantitative economic historians today (robert whaples, 1995), provide answers to many heretofore-unresolved issues involving the adoption of the constitution. the economic history of the drafting and ratification of our nation’s constitution makes it hard to envision any actual constitutional setting, including any setting to reform existing constitutions, in which self-interested and partisan behavior would not dominate. empirically examines the wealth and economic interests of the framers of the constitution and ratifiers at the thirteen state conventions. in terms used in constitutional political economics, even when the founders were making fundamental “constitutional” choices rather than more specific-interest “operational” choices, the modern evidence indicates their choices were still consistent with self-interested and partisan behavior. is limited though because it does not use explicit data to measure economic or other interests. argument for the importance of economic and other interests by a respected political scientist. this reexamination, which employs formal economics and modern statistical techniques, involves the application of an economic model of voting behavior during the drafting and ratification processes and the collection and processing of large amounts of data on the economic and financial interests and other characteristics of the men who drafted and ratified the constitution.

Basic economic thesis of the federalist papers-The Federalist Papers Essay 51 Summary and Analysis | GradeSaver

ANTI-FEDERALIST PAPERS | The Federalist Papers

brown examines the support for the constitution among various economic and social classes, the democratic nature of the nation, and the franchise within the states in eighteenth-century america. a useful preliminary study, reexamining the adoption of the constitution employing the methods of modern economic history. economic historians have begun to reexamine the behavior of our founding fathers concerning the constitution. the modern economic history of the constitution asks: how did a particular economic interest (for example, slaveholdings) per se influence the founders’ voting behavior taking into account all the influences of other factors on those founders’ voting behavior (for example, the slaveholding founders)?. differences of these magnitudes suggest that ratification of the constitution strongly depended on the specific economic, financial, and other interests of the specific individuals who attended the state conventions. others question an economic interpretation because they question whether political principles, philosophies, and beliefs can be ignored in an attempt to understand the design of the constitution. jensen’s conclusion about the controversy over charles beard is especially revealing, as he maintains that the founders would have been bewildered because they “took for granted the existence of a direct relationship between the economic life of a state or nation and its government. 16-18) argued that the formation of the constitution was a conflict based upon competing economic interests – interests of both the proponents and opponents.

What is Madison's thesis in Federalist Paper Number 10

were the economic, financial, and other interests of the founders significant factors in their support for the constitution, or their support for specific clauses in it, or their support for ratification? a concise presentation of the economic history of early america from the colonial period through the early national period by two eminent economic historians of early america.” however, the modern evidence does indicate that fewer economic and financial interests mattered for the basic design of the constitution than for specific-interest aspects of it. precisely, the economic model is that a founder acted individually to maximize the net benefit he received from his votes. buchanan and tullock maintain that it is in the self-interest of rational citizens to adopt a constitution that contains economically “efficient” rules that promote the interests of the society as a whole rather than the interests of any particular group. the types of economic interests that mattered for the choice of specific issues were those that were likely to have accounted for a substantial portion of the overall wealth or represent the primary livelihood of the founders. based on large amounts of new data on the economic, financial, and other interests of the founding fathers, an economic model of their voting behavior, and formal statistical analysis. this would have given the national congress the power to limit the economic viability of slavery, if it so chose.

Style Manual for Political Science

employs the historical literature to categorize the interests of the states represented at the convention and then tests whether the states voted together on particular issues, concluding that when they did, economic or political interests mattered. the economic model presumes that a founder was motivated by self-interest to maximize the satisfaction he received from the choices he made at the constitutional convention attended. yet brown and mcdonald are still credited by many with delivering the fatal blows to beard’s economic interpretation of the constitution. offers no formal or quantitative analysis of the economic or financial interests of the founders. the primary reason is that the statistical technique employed in the modern reexamination yields estimates of the separate influence of a particular economic interest or other factor on the founders’ behavior (how they voted) taking into account, and controlling for, the influence of other interests and factors on the founders’ behavior. to earlier views that the founders’ specific economic or financial interests cannot be principally identified with one side or the other of an issue, the modern evidence indicates that their economic and financial interests can be so identified. contends it is nearly impossible to identify the supporters or opponents of the constitution with specific economic interests. concludes that for the philadelphia convention and the ratifying conventions the facts do not support an interpretation of the constitution based on the economic interests represented.

SparkNotes: The Federalist Papers (1787-1789): Summary

commonly referred to today as the federalist papers, a collection of eighty-five essays written, between october 1787 and may 1788, under the pseudonym “publius,” in support of the constitution during the ratification debate in new york, seventy-seven of which originally appeared in the new york press. when the founders were deciding on the general issue of the basic design of the constitution to strengthen the national government, economic and other interests significantly influenced them. major advances in both economic thinking about political behavior and statistical techniques have taken place in the last thirty or so years. while emphasizing a rational choice view of the founders, it places little weight on the importance of economic interests per se.” nor does it mean that some “conspiracy among the founders” or some fatalistic concept of “economic determinism” explains the constitution. dismisses an economic interpretation as utterly without merit, attacking its conclusions in their entirety. the central government also lacked the legal power to enforce uniform commercial or trade regulations – either at home or abroad – that might have been conducive to the development of a common economic trading area. of the quantitative approach: a new economic interpretation of the constitution.

The Making of a Conservative Superstar - The Atlantic

” these prohibitions were important to the development of a market economy because they constrained governments from interfering in economic exchange, making the returns to economic activity more secure. estimation of a logistic regression model is designed to determine the marginal or incremental impact of each explanatory variable – the measures of the economic interests and ideologies – on the dependent variable – the “yes” or “no” votes on a particular issue at philadelphia or ratification.” further concludes “the evidence we now have leads most historians to conclude that no sharp economic or social line can be drawn on a nationwide basis. collectively, these writings have become known as the anti-federalist papers. many others question an economic interpretation because they question whether the founders were really attempting to solely, or even to principally, enhance their personal wealth, or the wealth of those they represented, as a result of adopting the constitution.’s thesis soon emerged as the standard historical interpretation and remained so until the 1950s, when it began to face serious scholarly challenges. the principal arguments in favor of it were stated in the series written by madison, hamilton, and jay called the federalist papers, although they were not as widely read as numerous independent local speeches and articles. important read to understand the scholarly opinion of an “economic interpretation of the constitution” among many.

reports the findings of the survey so that they indicate whether there are differences in the consensus on various issues among scholars trained in economics versus scholars trained in history. whaples surveyed economists and historians whose specialty is american economic history to determine whether, and where, there is consensus among economic historians on forty important historical issues concerning the american economy. a nice starting point for a general understanding of the economic history of early america. brown’s (1956) critique dismisses an economic interpretation as utterly without merit, attacking beard’s conclusions in their entirety. openly rejects an economic interpretation during ratification, claiming that “virginia ratified the constitution . brown accuses beard of taking the philadelphia debates out of context, falsely editing the federalist, and misstating facts. when specific issues arose at the philadelphia convention that had a direct impact on important economic interests of the founders, their economic interests, even narrowly defined, significantly influenced the specific design of the constitution, and the magnitudes of the influences were often quite large. many studies in the traditional literature question an economic interpretation of the constitution because they question whether the constitution is strictly an economic document designed solely to promote specific economic interests.

others question an economic interpretation because they question whether the founders were really involved in a conspiracy to promote specific economic interests. the first modern attempt by economists to develop an economic theory of constitutions. further concludes there is no measurable relationship between specific economic interests and specific voting at the philadelphia convention nor generally between specific economic interests and the votes at most of the ratifying conventions. 31-51) claimed that support for his argument could be found in the economic conditions prevailing during the 1780s.” offers no formal or quantitative analysis of the role of any economic, financial, or other interests, however. contrast, forrest mcdonald’s (1958) study empirically examines the wealth, economic interests, and the votes of the delegates to the constitutional convention in philadelphia that drafted the constitution in 1787 and of the delegates to the thirteen ratifying conventions that considered its adoption afterward. but neither self-interest nor economic rationality implies that a founder was concerned only with his financial or material well-being.” offers no formal or quantitative analysis of the role of any economic, financial, or other interests.

others have suggested that the adoption of the constitution was the product of conflict between various economic and financial interests within the nation, a conflict between those who, because of their interests, wanted a strengthened, more powerful national government and those who, because of their interests, did not. the modern approach represents an impartial, disinterested explanation of the behavior of our founding fathers, employing what are today commonly accepted techniques of economic and statistical analysis. of course, it was not designed merely to promote economic interests. these changes were most important because they increased the benefits of exchange (the cornerstone of a market economy) and created incentives for individuals to specialize in economic activities in which they had a particular advantage and then engage in mutually advantageous exchange (trade) with individuals specializing in other economic activities. to form a more perfect union: a new economic interpretation of the united states constitution. the federalist: a commentary on the constitution of the united states, being a collection of essays written in support of the constitution agreed upon september 17, 1787, by the federal convention. modern economic history of the constitution indicates that charles beard’s economic interpretation has not yet been refuted. federalist papers admins do a wonderful job of going through our founding documents (and sometimes others) to find pertinent, timely and always thought-provoking pieces.

How it works

STEP 1 Submit your order

STEP 2 Pay

STEP 3 Approve preview

STEP 4 Download


Why These Services?

Premium

Quality

Satisfaction

Guaranteed

Complete

Confidentiality

Secure

Payments


For security reasons we do not
store any credit card information.