Essay services



List of approved essay services

Cons of death penalty essay

  • The Death Penalty: Pro and Con | Top British Essays

    Cons of death penalty essay


    Top 10 Pros and Cons - Death Penalty -

    the first thing i am going to talk about is the states and countries that still have the death penalty. • • the attorney general devotes about 15% of his budget, or million once a year to death penalty cases. was sentenced to death by a jury of his peers and has been on death row for 30 years after exhausting all of his appeals at both the state and federal level. the death penalty’s reinstatement as a possible punishment for crimes ranging from treason to murder has brought the constitutionality and morality of the punishment into question by anti-capital punishment protesters. the death penalty is killing a human for being convicted of a terrible crime one family may think its right but both suffer by their lost ones. after some research and some careful consideration i have come to an opinion concerning the death penalty. fact, most murderers feel they most likely will never be put to death. no way one can tell whether the death penalty deters murderers from killing. like the debate on the legalization of marijuana, the death penalty has elicited mixed feelings on all the citizens globally. sister helen opposes the death penalty, whereas the apostle paul, in romans 13, did not object to the death penalty.- the death penalty seems to be a very debatable subject. death for murder and other crimes like kidnapping and witchcraft. one policy that i have long considered confusing is the application of the death penalty by many states.- the debate on if the death penalty is ethical is something that is a long-standing debate depending on what side of the issue you are on. lastly, abolishment of the penalty would help rid any of the negative and humane issues at hand: this involves the biblical verse; thou shalt not kill, and the national human rights law; article 3, and 5 of the declarat. most people who think the death penalty is effective don’t usually know all of the facts or how much time and money are used to put someone into death row. maine and rhode island abolished the death penalty because of public. that there is no deterrent effect by using the death penalty. in this essay, i will elaborate on capital punishment and on the cases of joe guy, tommy zeigler, leroy orange, and charles munsey. the family of a child who has been raped and murdered by the old creepy guy down the block would love to see that man receive the final sentence of death. have the death penalty and achieve no deterrent effect, than, the life of. if you are given the death penalty, your life will be taken.- almost all nations in the world either have the death sentence or have had it at one time.  some people say the that penalty is legalized murder because. however, two people have been sentenced to death for the rape of a minor.

    Resume project director position
  • Top 10 Pros and Cons - Death Penalty -

    Free Death Penalty Essays and Papers

    Free Death Penalty Essays and Papers

    and while the death penalty is usually implemented by autocracy or religious doctrine, it is almost never used in response to actual modern societal values. despite the growing acceptance of the death penalty as an appropriate punishment for certain kinds of crimes such as first degree murders, there are still some people who argue against it on certain grounds. after reading the article in the textbook, two other articles, and looking at statistics, i seem to feel that the death penalty may not be the right answer. on death row has a chance to prepare his death, make a will,And make his last statements, etc. the options ranges from executions are in humane, there is a risk that an innocent can be executed, and is the death penalty really a deterrent for future crime. states that have the death penalty should be free of murder, but."petitioners, sentenced to die for the crimes they committed (including, in the case of one petitioner since put to death, raping and murdering an 11–month-old baby), come before this court asking us to nullify their sentences as 'cruel and unusual' under the eighth amendment. states with the death penalty and 18 states with death penalty bans. death penalty-the pros and cons, and how our criminal justice system makes. for each inmate put to death, the studies say, 3 to 18 murders are prevented. question background / general moral & ethical issues legal considerations deterrence & retribution social issues death penalty vs. if we would put these inmates through the death penalty quickly, we could take the problem away from the country. some may believe that the death penalty is a just and moral punishment for the most serious of crimes; victims and their families are morally entitled to long for revenge. the existence of the death penalty as a possible sentence leads to guilty pleas that save the money spent on trials and limit the opportunity for appeals.- imagine that someone you love or someone very close to you is a victim of a very serious crime, a crime so serious that the person who committed it is now sitting on death row with limited time left to live.- just the very mentioning of the “death penalty” can bring out a fury in most people. when we discussed this policy while i was in a bible class in high school, i could not decide if i was for or against the death penalty. the death penalty is a controversial issue that has been debated for years.” therefore, the death penalty must be upheld in the united states of america in order to protect its citizens and to properly enforce justice. murderers who do not have any money, receive the death penalty. as the severity of crimes that attract the death penalty is debatable, so is its correctness and effectiveness. the death penalty is a concept of retribution, it's a simple and swift answer to physical or pyschological harm done to a person by the victim or victim's family. the reasons i have set forth in this opinion, i believe it highly likely that the death penalty violates the eighth amendment. of the death penalty have reached various conclusions about its effectiveness in deterring crime. it establishes order in society by putting the fear of death in to would be killers.

    Senior market researcher resume
  • Cons of death penalty essay



    the death penalty has been considered to be one of the most cruel and unusual punishments for sentencing criminals."death penalty opponents state it is inherently unfair and racially biased. cases like carlos deluna, where they have been put to death then found innocent after the deed had been done., thousands of people are sentenced to death every year in countries where the death penalty is practiced. (1978) states- is there any way one can tell whether the death. to many the death penalty sounds cruel and heartless and to others people feel that it is better to kill a mass murderer for example then to keep them in prison for life. the physical mechanics involved in the act of execution are easy to grasp, but the emotions involved in carrying out a death sentence on another person, regardless of how much they deserve it, is beyond my own understanding. the death penalty ensures fair retribution for the loved ones of the criminal’s victim. however, if someone asked what your thought is on the death penalty, most would probably say that they are against it that is until a family member or someone you love is walking down the street and that man who was looking for their next victim found them. when it comes to the death penalty, people are killed every day and or put on death row because of a crime that they committed.” later, when the guilty man is scheduled to learn of the cost of his crime at sentencing: “you have been sentenced to death by lethal injection. the bible says that death should be done to anyone who commits murder, larceny, rapes, and burglary. and crimes leads to some people being imprisoned, while others are put on death row. our death row population is more than 40% black -- nearly three times the proportion of the general population. the word death penalty is used,It makes yelling and screaming from both sides of extremist.- why is the death penalty still allowed throughout much of the u. for example, they don't take into account the increase in the cost of life without parole cases if there were no death penalty. now in this essay i will tell the reasons some states and countries still have the death penalty and why some do not, also some cases of people getting sentenced to it when they were really innocent. the use of the death penalty puts the united states in the same category as countries like iran and saudi arabia which are two of the world’s worst human rights violators (friedman 34).- in the past death sentence was believed as the best punishment for anyone who took another’s life. refine our death penalty statutes and review the sentences of everyone on death row. the innocent can take solace in knowing that a unanimous jury of 12 citizens must render the death verdict after an exhaustive trial where the accused murderer is represented by two highly competent attorneys and overseen by an independent judge who ensures a fair trial. (the husband) was sentenced to death, but committed suicide in prison. and in most cases the death penalty is used when the criminal has been convicted of murder. a prosecutor, i saw that the death penalty's racial legacy could not be excused or explained away -- and that too many innocent lives were being taken by this profoundly flawed practice.

    Persuasive Essay on Death Penalty: Pros and Cons | Custom

    one philosophy about the treatment of the unjust is most controversial in modern time and throughout our history; which is is the ethical decision of a death penalty.- capital punishment, otherwise known as “the death penalty,” has been around for many years and has been the cause of death for over twelve hundred inmates since 1976 (“death penalty information center”), but is the death penalty really beneficial to the american public.- the abolishment of the death penalty as americans we live in a modern republic under a government constructed to secure the rights of the people. is known, with all the appeals, the death penalty is not swift! • • it costs approximately ,000 more a year to house an inmate on death row, than in the universal prison population or . the prevalence of the death penalty in the modern world, it is fair to assume that there are perhaps justifications for it, though there are plenty of people who categorically oppose it."we expect physicians to offer comfort care to the dying, even if the treatment, like morphine to dampen end-stage cancer pain, will inevitably hasten death.” recent facts show that as of, “april 1, 2010, there are approximately 3,260 individuals,” waiting for their execution date while on death row in the us (“death penalty”) . who view this page may also like:States with the death penalty and states with death penalty bans. you may have read in the arguments, the death penalty help to curtail. the death penalty has been used since ancient times for a variety of offenses. while many believe that the death penalty is more of a deterrent than a lengthy prison sentence, the very concept of ‘deterrence’ is argued by many as inapplicable to criminal psychology, especially if mental illness is involved. for this exact reason, the death penalty should not be legal in the america. gross,"[r]ather than try to patch up the death penalty's legal wounds one at a time, i would ask for full briefing on a more basic question: whether the death penalty violates the constitution. the death penalty requires all of us, victims and spectators alike, to actively summon feelings of hatred and contempt in order to justify the murder of another human being. killing felons, the death penalty removes the burden of housing them within the penitentiary system."those in support of abolishing the death penalty point to the possibility of an innocent person being executed.- the death penalty should be discontinued to the families, human rights, and statistics. that authorize the death penalty for crimes other than murder.- the death penalty has been an ongoing debate for many years. the death penalty has been in existence for thousands of years and has gained wide acceptance in the united states since early colonial times. proponents of the death penalty say it is justice better served, away of retribution or “an eye for an eye,” to bring closure to the families of murder victims. for every 100,000 people in 2012, about 8% of the murders in the united states occurred in michigan, a non-death penalty state ("murder rates nationally and by state.- the death penalty is the pivot of much controversy within our society and government. 32 states allow the death penalty, and 17 do not; the latest state to outlaw the death penalty was maryland.

    The best nurse resume
  • pros and cons of capital punishment essay

    Cons of death penalty essay

Cons of death penalty essay-free essay on Pros and Cons to Capital Punishment

Against juvenile death penalty essay

- abolishing the death penalty when a person is found guilty in this country, they may either serve a term in prison or be put on death row.- death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is the punishment of execution that is administered to someone who committed a capital crime. is strong evidence that the death penalty does not discourage crime. if a parent is strict, many tendview full sample  ›expository essay on what makes a great leaderoctober 20, 2014expository essays on what makes a great leader are focused on explaining the difference between an ordinary leader and a great leader."perhaps the most important factor in determining whether a defendant will receive the death penalty is the quality of the representation he or she is provided. has been reported that, “since 1973 over 130 people have been released from death row with evidence of their innocence (“death penalty”). many believe the death penalty based on the “eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth” concept."to me, the death penalty also is something else — a sad reminder of how our justice system typically offers punishment instead of healing for the survivors of violent crime…. the death penalty is still prevalent in many parts of the world, especially in the middle east, asia, and north africa, with notable countries including iraq, egypt, pakistan, bangladesh, india, and the usa. the death penalty should be abolished because of its financial costs to tax payers, it’s barbaric, and its ineffectiveness.- a number 1263 men and women have been executed in the united states in the twenty five years ever since the supreme court has reintroduced the death penalty in 1976."[w]e reserve the death penalty in the united states for the most heinous murders and the most brutal and conscienceless murderers."there's no evidence that death penalty is a deterrent against crime,". today, we face the choice to continue or abolish the death penalty.- the death penalty, ever since it was established, has created a huge controversy all throughout the world., i read where a husband intentionally moved to a non death penalty state,So he could murder his wife and get away with it. illustration purposes, a brief persuasive essay on this topic is as follows:Serious offenses like murder and rape generally attract a death penalty. but, as facts continue to prove, enforcing the death row has little to no effect in the deterrence of criminals and instead, can leave innocent people hanging from a noose.- when it comes to the issues of dying by abortion, euthanasia or the death penalty society views each issue passionately. the death penalty is racially and economically biased, rarely reversed for the wrongly accused, and the government should not have that power. or would you be hoping that evidence would come to light to show them innocent or, even though the crime was horrific would you think they don’t deserve to be punished by death. the death penalty does not cause the problem but it is merely a response to it.- the question regarding whether the united states should implement the death penalty as a form of punishment is a heated issue in american politics., the case against the death penalty is much stronger than the case for it. most human beings maintain a strong underlying fear of dying, so they wish to prevent their own death, especially their murder, at any cost.

Death Penalty: The Pros and Cons of Capital Punishment Essay

presently, only eight-six countries have completely abolished the use of capital punishment, while seventy-four countries still retain some use of the death penalty. death penalty for crime like this, but figures showed kidnapping increased. it might sound irreligious to sentence an offender to death; disobedience to laws is denounced in all religions. we do not know whether the death penalty will deter others, we will be.- the death penalty can be an extremely touchy subject in every community on the emotional side as well as the political side.- the death penalty the death penalty is a form of punishment in which a person who has been convicted of a serious crime is executed under the precept of the criminal justice system. criminals were even crushed to death slowly under heavy weight. criminal defendants who are facing the death penalty — which today must be pleaded by prosecutors up front — often want to make a deal by pleading guilty to first degree murder in exchange for a sentencing recommendation of life without parole. regardless of this development the death penalty has been in existence as far back as history can tell. for many years, people have been rationalize themselves for death penalty as " an eye for an eye"(2010). and if they were paroled, there is always the chance they could re-offend, which is completely eliminated with the death penalty. the earliest proof of the death penalty dates back to the eighteenth century b. turn, dying is feared because death is expected, even though death is." (mcadams) the death penalty should be legalized in all fifty states, to avert from crime, keep repeat offenders off of the streets, and to reduce taxpayers the cost of keeping those found guilty of heinous crimes in prison low.”), but only 43 people were put to death by execution that year (“execution list 2012. of the death penalty, there are two lives to think about. throughout history, the controversy over the necessity of the use of the death penalty has continued.- the death penalty continues to be an issue of controversy and is an issue that will be debated in the united states for many years to come. the controversy in our society is whether the death penalty/capital punishment serves as a justified form of punishment. although this works for the most part, one has to wonder if a child who commits murder thinks about the fact that it can lead to a death sentence.- death penalty survey it's my belief that people often lack enough information to have an informed opinion, but go ahead and give their opinions anyway.- is the death penalty really a rational and effective way to respond to the crimes of certain prisoners. ernest van den haag argues that we should keep using the death penalty and hugo adam bedau thinks that is obsolete and we should discontinue its use. more importantly, there appears to be a general reduction in the number of death sentences even in the countries continuing to uphold the death penalty. having the death penalty in our society deters potential violent offenders from committing crimes, saves the government money, and guarantees that offenders will not commit these crimes again.

Uc personal statement essay

against juvenile death penalty essay
Death Penalty: The Pros and Cons of Capital Punishment Essay

Cons of death penalty essay

5 Pros and 5 Cons of Capital Punishment - Listovative

is arguable that countries still using the death penalty do so purely in response to criminality and try to deter future criminals with it. a global perspective, far fewer countries operate the death penalty when compared to countries that don’t.- since the reinstatement of the death penalty by the supreme court in 1976 there have been 1,245 criminals legally put to death as a punishment for a multitude of disturbing crimes (6).- the death penalty otherwise known as capital punishment, is the most extreme punishment a government can implement on its own people. never be as great as that of the death penalty. million dollars vs the death penalty costing 3 million dollars (schaefer, richard t, 2009 pg 176). if the costs of the death penalty were to be measured at the time of an execution, that might indeed be true.- the death penalty, a constant source of controversy and divided opinion, is the punishment of death given to criminals who commit severe crimes. the death sentence, and deter future murderers, we spared the lives of. another way, to sentence killers like those described above to less than death would fail to do justice because the penalty – presumably a long period in prison – would be grossly disproportionate to the heinousness of the crime.- the death penalty is currently used by 34 states and is used by the federal government for punishing federal crimes. many see the penalty as barbaric and against american values. The death penalty is stillThe leading source for pros & cons of controversial issues. in many cases, the appointed attorneys are overworked, underpaid, or lacking the trial experience required for death penalty cases. there have been multiple cases where death row inmates have been found innocent before being put to death, and then there are few that have ended unfortunately. this is not, as some critics argue, a kind of state-run lottery that randomly chooses an unlucky few for the ultimate penalty from among all those convicted of murder."no one can blame victims and their families for wanting revenge, including through the death penalty. 'cost studies,' often performed by or at the behest of death penalty opponents, are frequently so incomplete as to be false and misleading. imposing a death penalty will clean all killers and rapists from the society.  conviction of the innocent does occur and death makes a. and con quotes related to the core question: Should the death penalty be allowed?- the death penalty is a very controversial topic, and the passion of its supporters and naysayer runs high in opinions. the death penalty has been around from the earliest known civilizations to present day america. authenticity of our custom essay writing and confidentiality of all information are guaranteed. the general consensus hitherto has always been in favor for the death penalty.
for all these reasons, i say to prosecutors who seek the death penalty: not in my name. common dissertations written by students take the form of persuasive essay on death penalty: the pros and cons.- the death penalty as a form of justice around the world introduction: the death penalty is a subject that has become very big in the 21st century. the united states should use the death penalty because it is economical and continues to be a deterrent for potential offenders. reason for the discrepancy in the execution rate between blacks and whites is that juries deciding whether to impose the death penalty have concluded in more cases involving black defendants that there were extenuating circumstances militating in favor of a lesser penalty. i do not believe the death penalty should exist, even when the most heinous crimes have been committed. thirty one percent of society believes we should not keep the death penalty, while others believe that the death penalty doesn’t really keep crime from happening. american public still supports the death penalty, notwithstanding the hammering capital punishment receives each year.- what are the two things in america that absolutely everyone has an opinion on: two things, abortion and the death penalty. anything else is death penalty politics at the expense of the condemned. the death penalty was swift and inevitable, there certainly would be a.- death penalty historically, death penalty was used as the most severe punishment available if a person disobeyed the laws or committed murder. since murderers typically expose themselves to far greater immediate risks, the likelihood is incredibly remote that some small chance of execution many years after committing a crime will influence the behaviour of a sociopathic deviant who would otherwise be willing to kill if his only penalty were life imprisonment. also known as the death penalty, capital punishment is the most severe form of corporal punishment as it is requires law enforcement officers to kill the offender."local view: thoughts about the death penalty: correcting the record,". due to the severity of prisoners’ crimes on death row, it costs much more to feed, house, and seclude these often dangerous inmates than if they were simply put to death.  the penalty must be appropriate to the seriousness of the.- the death penalty has been around since the beginning of time as a means of punishing criminals, undisputed until the last century or so in terms of whether or not it is an ethical practice.- the death penalty in the united states is still intact, but in other nations it has been abolished. whether one compares the similar movements of homicide in canada and the us when only the latter restored the death penalty, or in american states that have abolished it versus those that retain it, or in hong kong and singapore (the first abolishing the death penalty in the mid-1990s and the second greatly increasing its usage at the same), there is no detectable effect of capital punishment on crime. texas and virginia being the two top death penalty states with a shared number of 580 people executed. students who use our service get a high score for their essays! the death penalty can in fact deter heinous crimes from being committed when it is lawful in a state. many centuries ago the death penalty is something that was widely practiced in almost all cultures., manufacturing, automobile, and air traffic, sports,Not to mention wars and revolutions, cause death of.

inmates that wait on the death penalty jail create a problem for everyone in the country. of years on the average spent in death row is 10 years. the jury has two decisions: either to let the defendant live or to let him or her die under the death penalty." over 4,500 people were executed and this doesn't even include the unreported deaths. this controversial issue of punishment by death has been going on for centuries. i'd attempt to educate them more on the subject by providing them some detailed information such as factual statistics on both the pros and cons of the death penalty.- to date, the united states has 32 states with the death penalty and 18 without it (“states with and without the death penalty. but if a poll were conducted tomorrow in islamic countries, would we find considerable support for juvenile death penalty.- the death penalty in the united states capital punishment results in the victims family gaining a greater sense of security, making sure the criminal is able to be punished to the highest degree for his crime, and honoring retribution. there evidence supporting the usefulness of the death penalty securing. my opinion, i am in favor of the death penalty, because we can save.- the death penalty is rooted deeply within the jewish torah because, “purging evil from the community in the person of the evildoer served more than the retributive function of expiating guilt. case, the death penalty is a gain, unless the convicted murderer is valued.- the legal definition of the death penalty is a sentence of execution for the crime including murder and some other capital crimes; serious crimes, especially murder, which are punishable by death. writing such an essay, one must provide a background into the topic. national interest can justify human rights violations such as the death penalty or torture. the definition of the death penalty is: execution of an offender sentenced to death after conviction by a court of law of a criminal offense. defenders of the death penalty state that it is an effective deterrent and punishment for murder (1), while the opposing side claims that it is the definition of hypocrisy at an ultimate and inhumane lev. favor the death penalty as a matter of justice and human dignity. bedau, the writer of “the death penalty in america”, capital punishment is the lawful infliction of the death penalty. would this question be easier to answer if the consequences of our decisions on change were now life or death. if not, this could bring into question not just the death penalty but all forms of sentencing whether it is capital punishment or not. ever since the death penalty was created, there have been people who supported the death penalty and those who wanted to destroy it. there have even been instances in which lawyers appointed to a death case were so inexperienced that they were completely unprepared for the sentencing phase of the trial. states with the death penalty and 18 states with death penalty bans.

"much of the cost, indeed, much of the criticism of the death penalty, is attributed to 'decades of appeals. the next step is to take a position, either to support or refute the notion of imposing death penalty."one of the most common misperceptions about the death penalty is the notion that the death penalty saves money because executed defendants no longer have to be cared for at the state's expense. one of the points it brought up was the cost of life without parole vs the death penalty, and those costs were stated as life without parole costing 1. is noted that we need extreme penalty as a deterrent to crime. the death penalty also known as capital punishment is the judicially ordered execution of a prisoner for an extremely serious crime. one hundred and thirty-six nations have abolished the death penalty.- when the country is in debt, and states are facing budget shortages, 0,932 is a lot of tax money to spend on one criminal to pursue the death penalty (“death penalty information center”). states do not have the death penalty:Alaska, district of colombia, hawaii, iowa, main, massachusetts,Michigan, minnesota, north dakota, rhode island, vermont, west virginia, and. argument for continuation of the death penalty is most likely a. many people believe that the death penalty is the only way to stop criminals who commit serious felonies.. supreme court ruled that the death penalty was cruel and unusual punishment, and stated in the eighth amendment would mean it was unconstitutional.[a]ll of the studies conclude that the death penalty system is far more expensive than an alternative system in which the maximum sentence is life in prison. liberty and justice for all: thoughts on the death penalty.- an eyewitness to the execution of john evans in alabama describes this scene from the final moments of a death penalty sentence being carried out: "the first jolt of 1900 volts of electricity passed through mr. death penalty also keeps us stuck in an angry stage of grief. in consideration of this truth, it emerges that the death penalty is neither advantageous nor prejudicial. is need to comprehend that a death penalty might be the only effective way of portraying crime as serious. when the death penalty was first created the methods that were used were gruesome and painful, it goes against the eighth amendment that was put in place many years later. are many arguments against the death penalty that are both practical and ethical.   death penalty america has always had a history of using the death penalty, but no subject has received greater debate. while this is bad enough for non-death sentencing, these constitute a heinous breach of justice if the death penalty is involved. Officially, thousands of people are sentenced to death every year in countries where the death penalty is practiced. gross,"some crimes are so heinous and inherently wrong that they demand strict penalties – up to and including life sentences or even death. most importantly, in its supreme gravity it [the death penalty] promotes belief in and respect for the majesty of the moral order and for the system of human law that both derives from and supports that moral order.
justice can be served by inflicting the death sentence for murder. the concept of retribution, that the perpetrator is punished in a manner fitting to the crime, is also used to support the death penalty. it is unknown as it is certain, death is universally feared. since many people are scared of death, they will not do anything that will cause them to get the death penalty. those for the death penalty argue that it creates deterrence, punishment, and justice. enter the title keyword:Free Death Penalty papers, essays, and research papers. the process of prosecuting and convicting an individual is astronomical, and there is great debate as to whether the death penalty actually works as a deterrent. the more well known forms of capital punishments that are used today that started in the seventies are death by lethal injection or electrocution. why do we keep murderers and criminals on death row around.- the death penalty is a just and proper punishment the idea of putting another human to death is hard to completely fathom. cruel and unusual punishment being defined as torture or a deliberately degrading punishment, in no way does the death penalty fall into this category. in all, you can buy an essay online on this persuasive topic at customwritings writing service. hire, where the possible penalty of death may well enter. the issue of death penalty is wholly unconstitutional as it goes against our rights undoubtedly stated in the constitution. while those that oppose the death penalty argue about the risk of executing an innocent person or life in prison is a worst punishment. while the majority of americans tend to believe in the inherent right of the state to exact capital punishment on suspected murderers, an increasing opposition to the death penalty can be seen both within the us and globally."as superintendent of the oregon state penitentiary, i planned and carried out that state's only two executions in the last 54 years i used to support the death penalty. the topic is so divisive because it deals with death, which is permanent.  today,There are many pros and cons to this death penalty issues. [of the death penalty] wrongly equate retribution and revenge, because they both would inflict pain and suffering on those who have inflicted pain and suffering on us."introduction: an abolitionist's perspective," in moving away from the death penalty. the death penalty will always be a debatable topic because no one should have the right to decide who should live or who should die. one is always hearing about an innocent man going free because of dna testing, or protests outside of jailhouses as criminals are being put to death. cases, the death penalty is the only penalty that can deter. could be a strong argument if it could be proved that the death.

How it works

STEP 1 Submit your order

STEP 2 Pay

STEP 3 Approve preview

STEP 4 Download

Why These Services?









For security reasons we do not
store any credit card information.