- 100% plagiarism-free papers
- Prices starting at $10/page
- Writers are native English speakers
- 100% satisfaction guarantee
- Free title and reference pages
- Attractive discount policy
This company created in 2001
- Free Unlimited Revisions
- 24/7 Customer Support
- Team of professional English writers and Editors
- Attractive Discount System
- Plagiarism Free Papers
- Confidentiality and Authenticity
- Money back guarantee
- Direct Contact with Writer
This company created in 2004
- Writing original dissertations from scratch
- Writing any part of dissertation per your instructions
- Editing/proofreading of your dissertation by professional editors
- No plagiarism – guaranteed!
no ready-made papers, only original writing
- 24/7 support team
help you need while writing a dissertation
- Highly qualified writers
only native speakers with PhD degrees
- Affordable pricing system
This company created in 2010
The Death Penalty | Teen Opinion Essay | Teen Inksince civil rights come from agreeing to the contract by both parties, those who choose to violate their contractual obligations, such as by committing crimes, abdicate their rights, and the rest of society can be expected to protect itself against the actions of criminals. death penalty or life sentence is the only way to punish the criminals and protect the society from hardcore criminals. it is often highlighted that the old testament defines acts that would be punishable by the death penalty, and that the 6th commandment is really translated to “thou shalt not murder”, not “thou shalt not kill”. so, assigning death penalty to all criminals is not correct and not possible too. what if the death penalty was a deterrent to violent crime? in tennessee, death penalty trials cost an average of 48% more than the average cost of trials in which prosecutors seek life imprisonment. for example, pakistan has controlled the rate of terrorism in the country by enforcing death penalties for the members of terrorist organisations. argument about the capital punishment or death penalty is a very controversial one. otherwise, penalties rather than death should be tried to punish anyone. the moratorium is not binding, but established an international consensus against the death penalty. a majority of protestant sects in the united states have upheld the necessity of the death penalty for heinous crimes according to selective interpretation of the bible. otherwise, penalties rather than death should be tried to punish anyone. the painstaking measures of having to repeat a trial could easily double costs, and the prevention of doubling costs is to make sure things are done right the first time around, or to remove the death penalty as an option altogether. in the us state of georgia, the system of representation in death penalty cases is reportedly in crisis because of insufficient funding and cases are grinding to a long but familiar halt.
Do you support the death penalty? |arthur chaskalson, president of the south african constitutional court, chief justice of the republic of south africa in a 1995 decision he favored that ruled south africa's death penalty unconstitutional. talking about the essential role of the death penalty, you have to think about the meaning, and the purpose, of any kind of punishment..) numerous programs funding dna testing of evidence to exonerate potentially wrongly convicted inmates on death row, which is producing a steady trickle of freed prisoners, a striking percentage of whom are black or other minorities. third argument is actually a rebuttal to a claim made by some supporters of the death penalty. fact, i believe the death penalty is the only way to punish the criminals as they commit serious crimes which directly aid in controlling the violence at least to some extent. the prolonging of a trial that comes with the death penalty, the specialized incarceration that death row inmates are subject to, the processing of appeals, and the actual cost of the execution increase the costs drastically. people believe that death penalties are necessary to keep law and order under control in our society. justice: juries deciding life and death with only half the truth by richard c. another reason that there is no general consensus on whether or not the death penalty is a deterrent is that it is used very rarely – only about one out of every 300 murders actually results in an execution. opponents of the death penalty do not agree and have a valid argument when they say, “the claims that capital punishment reduces violent crime is inconclusive and certainly not proven. this reform will shape the future of our country, and we cannot jump to quick solutions such as the elimination of the death penalty. death penalty could be an uncivilised law in some cases. economic argument is usually a last-ditch effort to appeal to rationalism, and it is not a very strong one for supporters of the death penalty since most information about the cost of the death penalty in comparison to other penalties show the death penalty as being much more costly. capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase.
Free Death Penalty Essays and Papers: arguments against the death penaltyyou are here:homelawessay: arguments against the death…. may 2001 | "capital punishment and implementation of the safeguards guaranteeing protection of the rights of those facing the death penalty". to rein this situation, there should be a mechanism in place like jail for lifetime and death penalty based upon the crime severity. believe that some criminals are simply dangerous for the society and will always be no matter how much opportunities and support they are given, and they should be given the death penalty. the dharmasastras describe many crimes and their punishments and calls for the death penalty in several instances, particularly in manu smriti (the “lawbook for mankind” where it is supported that a murderer should be condemned to death so that in his next life he will not have to suffer for the great sin he has committed). on the other hand, some criminals who commit crimes like robbery pick pocket and so on should not be given death penalty or a very long sentence. the only “fairness” established by applying the death penalty is equating the mentality of a justice system or persons with the mentality of the criminal in question. if an error does occur, and an innocent person is executed, then the problem lies in the court system, not in the death penalty. the physical mechanics involved in the act of execution are easy to grasp, but the emotions involved in carrying out a death sentence on another person, regardless of how much they deserve it, is beyond my own understanding. i too agree with the alternative way of punishment which is less severe than death. in the conclusion, it can be seen that instead of punishing with death sentence criminals should be kept in proper rehabilitation centre, where they are guided with proper psychiatric education and they should be made a responsible member of the community. talking about the essential role of the death penalty, you have to think about the meaning, and the purpose, of any kind of punishment. iran's own laws proclaim the earlier mentioned crimes to be punishable by death, as well as sodomy, incest, "fornication", drinking alcohol, "sodomy", homosexual relations/lesbianism, “being at enmity with god” (mohareb), and “corruption on earth” (mofsed fil arz). even if we were to throw aside all other moral questions regarding the death penalty and focus solely on this point for reasoning that the death penalty is a good idea, we still could not find it satisfying because punishments are not made only because they are intended to deter future crimes.
Arguments for and Against the Death Penalty2003 legislative audit in the us state of kansas found that the estimated cost of a death penalty case was 70% more than the cost of a comparable non-death penalty case. idea of putting another human to death is hard to completely fathom. therefore, the death penalty is argued to be a barbaric and savage approach. schieder makes the serious argument in ayn rand, i and the universe: “in the case of murder, the death penalty - issued by way of putting the culprit to sleep to then apply the lethal injection - is the time delayed procedure of self-defense as carried out by the representatives of the victim(s) who, at the time of the incident and due to the then existing circumstances, was/were unable to defend itself/themselves from the willful murderous attack. canada abolished the death penalty in 1976; contrary to some predictions by capital punishment supporters, the homicide rate in canada did not increase after abolition. in addition, in many cases, when you behave normally, you can benefit from penalty reductions. the social contract becomes null when the individual is put to death, and therefore no renewal of it becomes available. on a state-to-state comparison, states without the death penalty have lower homicide rates. by this reasoning, the death penalty must be used to keep our prisons safe and kill those who kill in prison, rather than weighing our approaches at making prisons safer. i don’t think that giving death sentence would deter the other criminals from doing the same and reduce the number of crimes.% of all convicted capital murderers and their attorneys argue for life, not death, in the punishment phase of their trial. as far as my opinion is concerned, i think that death penalty is important for criminals who commit serious crimes. states with the death penalty pay millions more in trial and imprisonment of death row inmates in contrast to trials where the death penalty is not optional. if this logic were followed appropriately, one would expect supporters of the death penalty for this reason to also support abortion, as abortion services are less costly to governmentally fund than the expenses the state would pour out throughout a person's maturation (education, state-supported medical insurance coverage, etc.
IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample 26 - Without capital punishment ourfor instance, increased drug trafficking in uae was controlled after the government imposed the death penalty on the offenders. as of july 9, 2009 there have been 135 exonerations from death row in 26 different states of the us. moreover death penalty saves a lot of government funds which is wasted in maintenance of these criminals who in most of the cases will remain criminals. however, this argument can be easily debunked if we analyze the crime rate in the countries where death penalty has been abolished a decade ago. criminals who don't have any chance of improvement or who have passion for criminal acts should be given death penalty to weep out the bad seeds from the society. they explain that the death penalty is the result of passionate anger and loss, and that by some very reasonable connection in logic, the violator must suffer to make the victims’ families and those affected feel better. rationale behind the death penalty might as well be a child’s definition of justice – that of vengeance and spite rather than mercy and fairness. acts such as premarital sex (though this applies only to virgin females who live at home with their fathers), breaking sabbath (perhaps by picking up sticks), cursing your parents, or giving one of your descents to molech might easily flood death rows in the west to exceeding capacity and constitute a new type of caedere for our language’s lexicon. of exoneration on death row are well-known in the us. while most of islam’s capital punishment-necessitating crimes sound absurd and outrageous, we should be thankful, at least for selective interpretation of the bible, that the crimes for which death is punishable by in christian scripture are not applied as serious law (though some dominionists and millennialists would prefer it that way). cited in favor of the death penalty are often dubious by including only murder rates per capita and the number of executions in some lengthy period of time. idea of putting another human to death is hard to completely fathom. hinduism in general preaches ahimsa (or ahinsa, non-violence), but also teaches that the soul is immortal and cannot be killed, that death is limited only to one’s physical body, and that death is something to be viewed with apathy. this kind of person who has taken other people's lives and dignity should be punished with the highest penalty like death to make the society a better place to live in.
Death penalty or capital punishment and essayby punishing those with death penalty will cause insolence for law in their hearts. however, it seems obvious to some americans that the death penalty is a just and proper way to handle convicted murderers. it has even been uttered that the death penalty serves to restore some metaphysical order in the universe that becomes unbalanced when an individual is murdered. death penalty could be an uncivilised law in some cases. this year's  budget report on california, where california could reportedly save up to one billion dollars in five years by eliminating the death penalty. there is also a limit to define: even if the death penalty is unavoidable, it would be a crime to apply it to inadequate cases."death for apostasy in the quran & hadith" from islam review, january 09, 2006. finally, those who betray with the country and compromise with the enemy with the freedom of the motherland should be hung till death in another word should be given capital punishment because of their heinous act. fourth argument is that the length of stay on death row, with its endless appeals, delays, technicalities, and retrials, keep a person waiting for death for years on end. in texas, no whites were sentenced to death for killing blacks in 173 cases, but death was imposed in 10 percent of the 517 cases of blacks killing whites. moreover death penalty saves a lot of government funds which is wasted in maintenance of these criminals who in most of the cases will remain criminals. we ought to give them death sentence as punishment,then what distinguishes us from the criminals? control the rate of criminal activities and for the protection of ordinary citizens’ lives, the guilty people, in many countries, are punished by death penalty. conclusion, i don't agree and believe in this death punishment as we always have a less severe alternative available.
Essay: Arguments against the Death Penalty - SchoolWorkHelperargument about the capital punishment or death penalty is a very controversial one. the death penalty is largely an issue left for american states rather than the federal government (though the federal government does have the power to carry out executions), and thirty-six states still exercise it. to find an individual guilty and sentence them to death on the basis of using the death penalty as extended self defense would require the same certainty that the individual in question was the actual killer – a certainty that cannot be expressed in courts and that cannot be equivocally expressed like that of immediate self defense with a serious face. even on a subgame level, by taking tiny bits of economic costs and comparing them, the death penalty is fiscally favorable. if there is no premeditation or past facts which can justify such a punishment, it is far too strict to apply the death penalty. the criminals should not be granted anything less than this death punishment. the point is that mirza was literally days away from death at times, and would have been executed for a crime he might not have committed if it weren’t for some setbacks, postponements, and international pressure on the broken system he was under the grips of. whether or not the death penalty is more costly than life imprisonment and the pre- and post-trial processes. there is also a limit to define: even if the death penalty is unavoidable, it would be a crime to apply it to inadequate cases. it should also be stressed that once a heinous crime has been committed, there are probably few if any deterrents to further crimes to avoid arrest and trial, especially if there is the prospect of the death penalty being applied to the initial criminal act. the propensity to jump to the death penalty is indefensible and without a great deal of moral character to support it. as it is taught, the soul is constantly reborn into another body upon death (this cycle is known as samsara) until the liberation from this cycle of death and rebirth or reincarnation and all of the suffering and limitation of worldly existence (moksha).“an eye for an eye,” is what some americans would say concerning the death penalty. for example, all the people expect a terrible penalty for a serial killer or a lunatic rapist.
Essay:Against the Death Penalty & Death Penalty Information's mobile death fleet | asia times online, jul 21, 2006 by antoaneta bezlova. by punishing those with death penalty will cause insolence for law in their hearts. has been proposed, within the contentions of the three listed purposes, that the death penalty meets the responsibilities of the western penal system. israel inherited the british mandate of palestine code of law, which included death penalty for several offenses, but in 1954 israel abolished it. this kind of person who has taken other people's lives and dignity should be punished with the highest penalty like death to make the society a better place to live in. an example is a dialogue between king dyumatsena and his son prince satyavan (section 257 of the santiparva) where a number of men are brought out for execution at the king's command but are pardoned from death: “sometimes virtue assumes the form of sin and sin assumes the form of virtue. thus, the death penalty does not become extended self defense, but a large miscarriage of justice under the veil of self defense. of the death penalty, like me, say that capital punishment is not a solution. death penalty in canada: twenty years of abolition "twenty years of abolition: the canadian experience" vers. for instance, recent attack by militants on schools in pakistan where they killed children urged the government to revoke the moratorium on the death penalty which resulted in reducing the growing number of attacks. essay about capital punishment kidakitap comessay about capital punishment debate pinterest essay against capital punishment capital punishment paper capital punishment essays argumentative essay againstcartoons about capital punishment death penalty capital punishment death penalty essay like success like success capital punishment death penalty essay like successagainst death penalty essay a conservative judge ruled that california s death penalty was cruel and unusual punishment but democrats are refusing to accept the repeal of capital persuasive essay on the death penalty. an inmate killing another inmate is also something that, by the economic argument those in favor of the death penalty attempt to use, will benefit society as we no longer have to pay for the deceased inmate’s incarceration expenses. as far as my opinion is concerned, i think that death penalty is important for criminals who commit serious crimes. people believe that death sentences are vital in maintaining peace and controlling hostility in society.
Example essay: The Death Penaltysupporters of the death penalty ask the question, “why should i, an honest hardworking taxpayer, have to pay to support a murderer for the rest of their natural life? perhaps all individuals on death row should remind antiabortionists that they were once fetuses. penalty or capital punishment and essay Sciencebiology chemistry english history sociology & philosophy earth & spaceenvironmental science geography media & art law businesscareers. conclusion, i don't agree and believe in this death punishment as we always have a less severe alternative available. but in cases where dna evidence is not present, accused blacks statistically have a higher chance of being convicted and sentenced to the death penalty than a white. alternatives to the death penalty are existent and far more pragmatic in most and if not all situations. due to that, the high court had punished death penalty to that group which has created a sensation as the capital punishment is very rare in my country and social volunteers said the crime rate is gradually decreasing after that incident. the realization that the death penalty is more expensive, supporters will often direct their venom at the pre- and post-trial procedures which they say are to blame for the costs and need to be changed rather than having the death penalty abolished altogether. krone, an arizonan who was the 100th person to be exonerated from death row in the united states, was found not guilty of the murder and rape of a bar manager over dna evidence in 2002., we are brought to a thorough consideration of the penal and judicial systems, their purpose, and the death penalty being applied therein. capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase. control the rate of criminal activities and for the protection of ordinary citizens’ lives, the guilty people, in many countries, are punished by death penalty. of the death penalty, like me, say that capital punishment is not a solution. finally, those who betray with the country and compromise with the enemy with the freedom of the motherland should be hung till death in another word should be given capital punishment because of their heinous act.
post of death penalty or capital punishment and essaybest paper ghostwriting for hire for phd.: againstargumentsdeath penaltyessayshare this postshare with facebookshare with twittershare with google+share with pinterestshare with linkedin. people believe that death penalties are necessary to keep law and order under control in our society. the notion that there is a logical case for the death penalty is absurd and insincere pseudologic. leviticus 24:17 and exodus 21:12 prescribe death for anyone who kills, while matthew 5:38-48 refute all of the teachings of the old testament directly regarding capital punishment and the concept of an “eye for an eye”. an economic argument for the death penalty exists is demonstrative of the devaluation of life from those who support the death penalty, where the state's money is apparently more valuable than an individual's life. with no death penalty share lower homicide rates | new york times, september 22, 2000, by raymond bonner and ford fessenden. has been submitted that the death penalty is a form of extended self-defense. said conclusions include the fact that it is not, as those in favor of the death penalty will argue with arguably inconclusive statistics, a deterrent to violent crime, is not an acceptable penalty for a violation of the social contract, is not more "economical" than life imprisonment, and by its nature permits a risk of executing innocent individuals regardless of the implementation of numerous safeguards. while deterrence is great, the death penalty still is not. on twittershare on googlei agree with y’all the death penalty is wrong because why make them die really quick when you can make them suffer for what they did? we should avoid the capital punishment (death penalty) and try to make our society more humane one. however, this argument can be easily debunked if we analyze the crime rate in the countries where death penalty has been abolished a decade ago. as of august 2009, 135 americans on death row have been exonerated.
these typically range from your friendly game of being bashed to death with rocks, or the always-entertaining and dignified public lynching. times, support for the death penalty is argued on an appeal to emotion about pain, suffering, and just punishment. therefore, the death penalty is argued to be a barbaric and savage approach. the criminals should not be granted anything less than this death punishment. if there is no premeditation or past facts which can justify such a punishment, it is far too strict to apply the death penalty. it highlights how a judicial system which does not demand much (if any) evidence can have horrible results if the death penalty is exercised within it. i too agree with the alternative way of punishment which is less severe than death.. kendell, "judge favors sentence other than death," cleburne times-review, april 13, 2009. we should avoid the capital punishment (death penalty) and try to make our society more humane one. recapitulate the above, it can be said that intrinsically link between death penalty and rate of crime cannot be established, rather government shall contemplate the fundamental root cause of the burgeoned violence. in these cases, many criminals are hang till death or even send to the electronic chairs and there really left no alternative rather than that. construction, sports, driving, and air travel all offer the possibility of accidental death even though the highest levels of precautions are taken. thomas aquinas wrote, “the civil rulers execute, justly and sinlessly, pestiferous men in order to protect the peace of the state,” he was probably under the same misguided impression as today’s advocates of the death penalty that murdering murderers prevents murdering. however, the chance that there might be an error is separate from the issue of whether the death penalty can be justified or not.
Essay agreeing with death penalty
the death penalty can only be viewed as extended self-defense with an indeterminate certainty that separates real self defense from the stupidly unique type of self defense that the death penalty is proposed to be. some people think that without death penalty it is impossible to retain the law and order in a country while others stand totally against the capital punishment and describe it as inhuman. death penalty or life sentence is the only way to punish the criminals and protect the society from hardcore criminals.” in the united states, 10 of the 12 states without capital punishment have homicide rates below the national average, federal bureau of investigation data shows, while half the states with the death penalty have homicide rates above the national average. as of now, the majority of american supports the death penalty as an effective solution of punishment. but yet, those in favor of the death penalty still attempt to use statistics and data to their advantage despite most data not being in favor of their argument. on the other hand, some criminals who commit crimes like robbery pick pocket and so on should not be given death penalty or a very long sentence. if supporting a death row inmate for the rest their life costs less than putting them to death, and ending their financial burden on society, then the problem lies in the court system, not in the death penalty. the only method that completely separates cold blooded murderers from our society is the death penalty. tahir hussain: life and death of hyde park man under spotlight, by richard edwards; 10 august 2009. dudley sharp’s 1997 paper, “death penalty and sentencing [dis]information”, sharp argues that with no death penalty and only life without parole, there is no deterrent for [life without parole] inmates killing others while in prison or after escape. for example, pakistan has controlled the rate of terrorism in the country by enforcing death penalties for the members of terrorist organisations. in a state-by-state analysis in the us of the last 20 years, the homicide rate in states with the death penalty has been 48 percent to 101 percent higher than in states without the death penalty. fact, i believe the death penalty is the only way to punish the criminals as they commit serious crimes which directly aid in controlling the violence at least to some extent.
) this however is not usually on par with the social positions commonly held by death penalty advocates who are regularly pro-life. he was also probably under an understandable impression that his prediction would be proven right someday with statistics and data, much like modern supporters who may be aware that there are no real statistics that prove the death penalty is a deterrent to violent crime yet hope there someday will be. by this definition, everything [that involves killing] is murder except the death penalty in nations where it is legal and armed casualties in times of war. in maryland death penalty cases cost 3 times more than non-death penalty cases, or million for a single case. in addition, in many cases, when you behave normally, you can benefit from penalty reductions. some people think that without death penalty it is impossible to retain the law and order in a country while others stand totally against the capital punishment and describe it as inhuman. habeas corpus and other post-appeal procedures, according to advocates of the death penalty like professor walter berns in his for capital punishment: crime and the morality of the death penalty, endlessly spin out cases and postpone punishment while never showing that a murderer was not guilty. the 1950 european convention on human rights recommended that the death penalty be abolished in european nations or restricted to times of war. in these cases, many criminals are hang till death or even send to the electronic chairs and there really left no alternative rather than that. insecurity is the major issue behind demanding capital punishment,then the best solution is framing the punishment in such a way that the culprit would never be a threat to the society,not hanging to death. think, imposing the death penalty as a punishment to all criminals to reduce crime have been a constant subject of debate all the world in recent years. as for the additional argument, that making a prisoner wait for years to be executed is cruel, then would not waiting for death in prison for the rest of your life be just as cruel, as in the case of life imprisonment without parole. this point does not satisfy the argument that the death penalty is necessary. the racial and economic bias is not a valid argument against the death penalty.
How it works
STEP 1 Submit your order
STEP 2 Pay
STEP 3 Approve preview
STEP 4 Download